IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v119y2019i2d10.1007_s11192-019-03059-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The progressive substitution of hazard ratios for relative risks in biomedical research

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Monsarrat

    (Paul Sabatier University
    Université de Toulouse)

  • Jean-Noel Vergnes

    (Paul Sabatier University
    McGill University)

Abstract

In biomedical research, epidemiological measures of risk/effect [effect sizes (ESs)] are predominantly derived from risk (or rate) ratios (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), or hazard ratios (HRs). Using the whole PubMed database, we detailed in this paper a phenomenon not yet described: a massive trend for HRs to be globally used as substitutes for RRs. All PubMed citations were bulk-downloaded and a data mining process led to a comprehensive database of 1,071,584 ES values. The proportion of abstracts containing only HR has exploded since the 2000s, while we observe an inverse trend for abstracts containing only RR. The annual number of abstracts with HR exceeded the number of abstracts with RR for 2006. The average annual growth rate of the number of abstracts with RR only and HR only between 1980 and 2017 was 15.1% and 32.6%, respectively. Training on HRs has become essential in the statistical education of physicians. Since the interpretation of HRs is slightly more difficult than that of ORs or RRs, it is also important to improve day-to-day communication with patients regarding this quite complex entity.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Monsarrat & Jean-Noel Vergnes, 2019. "The progressive substitution of hazard ratios for relative risks in biomedical research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1263-1267, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:119:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03059-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03059-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-019-03059-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-019-03059-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:119:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-019-03059-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.