IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v117y2018i2d10.1007_s11192-018-2906-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value of letters to the editor

Author

Listed:
  • Houcemeddine Turki

    () (University of Sfax)

  • Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb

    () (University of Sfax)

  • Mohamed Ben Aouicha

    () (University of Sfax)

Abstract

This letter proves the interest of scientists in writing and citing letters to the editor and shows the importance of letters to the editor for worldwide scientific community.

Suggested Citation

  • Houcemeddine Turki & Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb & Mohamed Ben Aouicha, 2018. "The value of letters to the editor," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1285-1287, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2906-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2906-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-018-2906-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Elm & Simon Wandel & Peter Jüni, 2009. "The role of correspondence sections in post-publication peer review: A bibliometric study of general and internal medicine journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(3), pages 747-755, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Houcemeddine Turki & Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb & Mohamed Ben Aouicha & Ajith Abraham, 2020. "Nature or Science: what Google Trends says," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1367-1385, August.
    2. Houcemeddine Turki & Mohamed Ali Hadj Taieb & Mohamed Ben Aouicha & Ajith Abraham, 0. "Nature or Science: what Google Trends says," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 0, pages 1-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2906-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.