IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v105y2015i2d10.1007_s11192-015-1746-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National versus international growth of medical research of India: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Har Kaur

    (Government Medical College and Hospital)

  • Preeti Mahajan

    (Panjab University)

Abstract

Medical research is known to be the most important research as it is directly related to the well being of humans. The government of India is spending a large amount of money on medical research through ICMR by way of various research projects. In this paper the growth of the research output of top 50 medical institutes of India has been observed in terms of national as well as international collaboration. It has been found that the growth of national research output has doubled and the growth of research with international collaboration has grown four times during 2003–2012. The overall growth is found to be consistent. Top 20 favorite countries of medical professionals in India have also been found with number of publication published with each country during 2003–2012.

Suggested Citation

  • Har Kaur & Preeti Mahajan, 2015. "National versus international growth of medical research of India: a case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 973-989, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1746-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1746-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-015-1746-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-015-1746-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1746-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.