IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v102y2015i2d10.1007_s11192-014-1489-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospective evaluation of the accessibility of Internet references in leading general medical journals

Author

Listed:
  • Paula A. Rochon

    (Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital
    University of Toronto
    Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)

  • Wei Wu

    (Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital)

  • Jerry H. Gurwitz

    (University of Massachusetts Medical School)

  • Sunila R. Kalkar

    (SRK Informatics)

  • Joel Thomson

    (Pixelligent)

  • Sudeep S. Gill

    (Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
    St. Mary’s of the Lake Hospital
    Queen’s University)

Abstract

This study prospectively evaluates the accessibility of Internet references in leading general medical journals and explores the impact of their lost accessibility. We identified all original contributions published in five leading peer-reviewed traditional general medical journals and one leading on-line journal that were published at two time points (January 2005 and January 2008). We followed the sample prospectively for 5 years and determined the number of Internet references that remained accessible. Our sample of 165 original contributions contained 154 Internet references. Accessibility to Internet references declined from 51 % after 4 years to 37 % after 8 years in the articles published in January 2005, and decreased from 78 % after 1 year to 44 % after 5 years in the articles published in January 2008. Among those Internet references published in the most highly-cited articles, only 19 % (95 % CI 10–35 %) remained accessible in March 2013. Among the Internet references cited in the Methods section of the articles, only 30 % (95 % CI 20–43 %) remained accessible. Of the 91 Internet references which were no longer accessible at the end of the follow-up period, 39 (43 %) were assigned a rating of either ‘important’ or ‘very important’. Accessibility of Internet references declines substantially over time most often because the information is updated or the sites become unavailable. Accessibility remains poor even among those Internet references that are most important.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula A. Rochon & Wei Wu & Jerry H. Gurwitz & Sunila R. Kalkar & Joel Thomson & Sudeep S. Gill, 2015. "Prospective evaluation of the accessibility of Internet references in leading general medical journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1375-1384, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1489-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1489-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-014-1489-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-014-1489-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhiqiang Wu, 2009. "An empirical study of the accessibility of web references in two Chinese academic journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(3), pages 481-503, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siluo Yang & Feng Ma & Yanhui Song & Junping Qiu, 2010. "A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 755-765, December.
    2. Siluo Yang & Junping Qiu & Zunyan Xiong, 2010. "An empirical study on the utilization of web academic resources in humanities and social sciences based on web citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(1), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Sampath Kumar, B.T. & Vinay Kumar, D., 2013. "HTTP 404-page (not) found: Recovery of decayed URL citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 145-157.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1489-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.