IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v13y2023i2d10.1134_s2079970523700673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Did the Local Community of Novosibirsk Akademgorodok Perceive Scientific Infrastructure Development Projects 15 Years Ago and How Does It Perceive Them Now?

Author

Listed:
  • K. N. Kalashnikova

    (Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
    Novosibirsk State University)

  • N. L. Mosienko

    (Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
    Novosibirsk State University)

  • A. V. Pirotskaya

    (Novosibirsk State University)

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study of how inhabitants of a settlement with scientific center status perceive projects for new facilities of science and technology infrastructure. The study was based on data from mass surveys conducted in 2006 and 2021 in Novosibirsk Akademgorodok. Its relevance is related to problems that most Russian scientific centers and science cities faced in the post-Soviet period and the need to transform these specific urban settlements. To solve these problems, various projects are being implemented to transform their environment, including the creation of technology parks and other new facilities of science and technology infrastructure. Their success depends largely on social factors, including how the population perceives innovations. Two projects for the creation of new facilities of science and technology infrastructure in Akademgorodok, Novosibirsk, are being considered: Technopark (2006) and the SKIF (Siberian Circular Photon Source) Collective Use Center (2021). The population’s perception of these projects was assessed by the following parameters: awareness of the project, attitude towards the project, and negative and positive expectations from the project’s implementation. As a result, differentiation in these parameters was revealed and possible points of conflict and their dynamics were described.

Suggested Citation

  • K. N. Kalashnikova & N. L. Mosienko & A. V. Pirotskaya, 2023. "How Did the Local Community of Novosibirsk Akademgorodok Perceive Scientific Infrastructure Development Projects 15 Years Ago and How Does It Perceive Them Now?," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 340-350, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:13:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1134_s2079970523700673
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970523700673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970523700673
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970523700673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:13:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1134_s2079970523700673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.