IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v8y2003i2d10.1023_a1024457227197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion of “The Predictive Value of Expenses Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings”

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Easton

    (The Ohio State University)

Abstract

Doyle et al. (2003, this issue) provide evidence that IBES exclusions have incremental explanatory power (over GAAP earnings) for future cash flows, for market-adjusted returns at the earnings announcement date, and for future market-adjusted returns. They argue that this evidence supports the viewpoint that “the current regulatory concern about the use of pro forma earnings may be warranted.” My contention in this discussion is that one can readily posit alternative explanations for each of the empirical results, in turn suggesting that the results do not provide a basis for regulatory concern. Further, since there is considerable evidence that IBES earnings differ from pro forma earnings, it is not clear that the empirical analyzes in this paper may be used to draw any conclusions about pro forma earnings.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Easton, 2003. "Discussion of “The Predictive Value of Expenses Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 175-183, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:8:y:2003:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1024457227197
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1024457227197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1024457227197
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1024457227197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lipe, Rc, 1986. "The Information Contained In The Components Of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24, pages 37-64.
    2. Mark T. Bradshaw & Richard G. Sloan, 2002. "GAAP versus The Street: An Empirical Assessment of Two Alternative Definitions of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 41-66, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theodore E. Christensen, 2007. "Discussion of “another look at GAAP versus the Street: an empirical assessment of measurement error bias”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 305-321, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey T. Doyle & Russell J. Lundholm & Mark T. Soliman, 2003. "The Predictive Value of Expenses Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 145-174, June.
    2. Haeyoung Shin & Michael Lacina & Shanshan Pan, 2024. "The order in a series of continuous special items and the likelihood of income classification shifting," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 829-862, October.
    3. Young-Soo Choi & Stephen Lin & Martin Walker & Steven Young, 2007. "Disagreement over the persistence of earnings components: evidence on the properties of management-specific adjustments to GAAP earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 595-622, December.
    4. Mark T. Bradshaw & Michael S. Drake & James N. Myers & Linda A. Myers, 2012. "A re-examination of analysts’ superiority over time-series forecasts of annual earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 944-968, December.
    5. Eric R. Holzman & Nathan T. Marshall & Joseph H. Schroeder & Teri Lombardi Yohn, 2021. "Is all disaggregation good for investors? Evidence from earnings announcements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 520-558, June.
    6. Jeffery S. Abarbanell & Reuven Lehavy, 2007. "Letting the “Tail Wag the Dog†: The Debate over GAAP versus Street Earnings Revisited," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 675-723, September.
    7. Lawrence D. Brown & Kumar Sivakumar, 2003. "Comparing the Value Relevance of Two Operating Income Measures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 561-572, December.
    8. Frank Heflin & Charles Hsu & Qinglu Jin, 2015. "Accounting conservatism and Street earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 674-709, June.
    9. Poonawala, Sakina H. & Nagar, Neerav, 2019. "Gross profit manipulation through classification shifting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 81-88.
    10. Shi, Linna & Wang, Ping & Zhou, Nan, 2017. "Enhanced disclosure of other comprehensive income and increased usefulness of net income: The implications of Accounting Standards Update 2011–05," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 139-144.
    11. Mark T. Bradshaw, 2011. "A discussion of “Do managers use earnings guidance to influence street earnings exclusions?”," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 528-538, September.
    12. Juhee Hwang & Cheol Lee & Giman Nam, 2024. "Classification Shifting and Future Stock Price Crash Risk," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 34(1), pages 74-96, March.
    13. Junwei Lu & Xiaoxia Bu & Jing Chen, 2021. "Do inflowing sophisticated investors induce classification shifting? New evidence from market liberalisation in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(5), pages 6193-6223, December.
    14. Desai, Naman & Nagar, Neerav, 2016. "A research note: Are auditors unable to detect classification shifting or merely not willing to report it? Evidence from India," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 111-120.
    15. Edith Leung & David Veenman, 2018. "Non‐GAAP Earnings Disclosure in Loss Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(4), pages 1083-1137, September.
    16. Lacina, Michael & Pan, Shanshan & Garner, Steve, 2024. "The BP oil spill and income classification shifting of oil and gas companies," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Anantharaman, Divya & Chuk, Elizabeth & Kamath, Saipriya, 2021. "Location, location, location! Real effects from the mandated removal of pension expected return from operating income," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108931, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Vinay Goyal & Subrata K. Mitra, 2022. "Is the asymmetric impact of aggregate revenue and aggregate earnings on the stock index in accordance with the prospect theory?," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 22(1), pages 200-222, March.
    19. Frank Heflin & Kalin S. Kolev & Benjamin Whipple, 2024. "The risk-relevance of non-GAAP earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 493-524, March.
    20. Yuan Ji & James Potepa & Oded Rozenbaum, 2020. "The effect of ASU 2014–08 on the use of discontinued operations to manage earnings," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1201-1229, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:8:y:2003:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1024457227197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.