IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v12y2007i1d10.1007_s11142-006-9024-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial discretion and the economic determinants of the disclosed volatility parameter for valuing ESOs

Author

Listed:
  • Eli Bartov

    (New York University)

  • Partha Mohanram

    (Columbia University)

  • Doron Nissim

    (Columbia University)

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of the expected stock-price volatility assumption that firms use in estimating ESO values and thus option expense. We find that, consistent with the guidance of FAS 123, firms use both historical and implied volatility in deriving the expected volatility parameter. We also find, however, that the importance of each of the two variables in explaining disclosed volatility relates inversely to their values, which results in a reduction in expected volatility and thus option value. This can be interpreted as managers opportunistically use the discretion in estimating expected volatility afforded by FAS 123. Consistent with this, we find that managerial incentives or ability to understate option value play a key role in this behavior. Since discretion in estimating expected volatility is common to both FAS 123 and 123(R), our analysis has important implications for market participants as well as regulators.

Suggested Citation

  • Eli Bartov & Partha Mohanram & Doron Nissim, 2007. "Managerial discretion and the economic determinants of the disclosed volatility parameter for valuing ESOs," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 155-179, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:12:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-006-9024-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-006-9024-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-006-9024-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-006-9024-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:12:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1007_s11142-006-9024-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.