IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i6d10.1007_s11135-025-02218-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do we know about highly-cited papers in medical informatics? Reasons or attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Sepideh Fahimifar

    (University of Tehran)

  • Ali Amoozgar

    (University of Tehran)

  • Mohammad Hossein Soleimanfar

    (University of Tehran)

  • Fatemeh Mozaffari

    (University of Tehran)

  • Marcel Ausloos

    (University of Leicester
    Bucharest University of Economic Studies
    GRAPES)

  • Behzad Gholampour

    (Parseh iMetrics Institute)

  • Sajad Gholampour

    (Parseh iMetrics Institute)

Abstract

Understanding the characteristics of highly-cited articles and the factors contributing to their popularity has been a perennial subject of interest for researchers. Various factors have been proposed as reasons for the high citation counts of these articles, which may vary across different domains. The content and quality of any article are two common factors that significantly influence its citation count. This study investigates the factors leading to the high citation counts of articles in the field of medical informatics using two algorithms: Lasso and Boruta, aiming to identify the most critical determinants of high citation rates. In addition to uncovering the reasons behind the high citation counts of previous articles, this research also explores the factors that may influence the likelihood of future citations. The findings of this study reveal that number of citations by international researchers plays a crucial role in predicting the citation counts of articles, even if there is only one international author among the authors of the subsequent articles. Furthermore, the h-index of the authors is a key factor in the realm of medical informatics, where articles authored by individuals with high h-index scores tend to receive more citations. Additionally, factors such as the reputation of the first author and the number of references/resources, combined with international collaboration and the author's h-index, have a positive impact on increasing the citation counts in the field of medical informatics. Although various articles in fields such as rheumatology, sport sciences, and osteoporosis have discussed the reasons for increased citations from a single perspective, such as the topic of the article, this paper identifies all the citation-increasing factors presented in the literature and examines the most important reasons for citation growth in the field of medical informatics with a comprehensive approach. This broad perspective can be considered one of the strengths of this research. It contributes to the existing knowledge base by exploring the reasons behind the high citation rates of these articles. Researchers and practitioners in medical informatics will find this article valuable as it offers insights into the factors that contribute to the impact and success of scholarly work in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Sepideh Fahimifar & Ali Amoozgar & Mohammad Hossein Soleimanfar & Fatemeh Mozaffari & Marcel Ausloos & Behzad Gholampour & Sajad Gholampour, 2025. "What do we know about highly-cited papers in medical informatics? Reasons or attributes," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(6), pages 5211-5234, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02218-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02218-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-025-02218-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-025-02218-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02218-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.