IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i6d10.1007_s11135-025-02165-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ChatGPT in thematic analysis: Can AI become a research assistant in qualitative research?

Author

Listed:
  • Kien Nguyen-Trung

    (Monash University, Clayton Campus)

Abstract

Despite an emerging body of scholarship on applying generative AI (GenAI) to qualitative data analysis, this area remains underdeveloped. This article evaluates how GenAI can support thematic analysis using a publicly available interview dataset from Lumivero. It introduces Guided AI Thematic Analysis (GAITA), an adaptation of King et al.’s (2018) Template Analysis. This framework positions researchers as a reflexive instrument and intellectual leader while thoroughly guiding GPT-4 in four stages: data familiarization; preliminary coding; template formation and finalization; and theme development. Additionally, the article proposes the ACTOR framework, a simple approach to combining different effective prompting techniques when working with GenAI for qualitative research purposes. Findings reveal GenAI’s capacity for analyzing the data, generating codes, subcodes, clusters, and themes, along with its adaptive learning and interactive assistance in organizing unstructured data and developing trustworthiness. However, this model has some key limitations in terms of its restricted context window for processing large datasets, its inconsistent outputs requiring multiple prompt attempts, the need to move across workspaces, and the lack of relevant training data for qualitative research purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kien Nguyen-Trung, 2025. "ChatGPT in thematic analysis: Can AI become a research assistant in qualitative research?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(6), pages 4945-4978, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02165-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02165-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-025-02165-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-025-02165-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02165-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.