IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i5d10.1007_s11135-025-02188-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education researchers’ beliefs and barriers towards data sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica A. R. Logan

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Allyson L. Hayward

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Lexi E. Swanz

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Ayse Busra Ceviren

    (The Ohio State University)

Abstract

Data sharing is increasingly becoming a highly encouraged or required practice for any federally funded research projects. However, the uptake of these practices in education science has been minimal. Research suggests that many researchers believe data sharing should be practiced always or often, but also suggests that many researchers rarely practice data sharing. This disconnect indicates a general lack of understanding around data sharing and suggests there are salient barriers that prevent education researchers from engaging in the practice. This work examines (a) the prevalence of positive attitudes and perceived barriers to data sharing in a sample of education researchers, and (b) if there is a difference between the perceived barriers for researchers who have different levels of data sharing experience. Results suggest education researchers generally hold positive attitudes towards data sharing, with 70% of the sample agreeing that it benefits their career, increases citations, and is good for science. However, barriers such as concerns about IRB issues and the potential for misinterpretation of shared data were prevalent among respondents. Additionally, researchers with more experience sharing data were less likely to agree with these barriers compared to those with less or no sharing experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica A. R. Logan & Allyson L. Hayward & Lexi E. Swanz & Ayse Busra Ceviren, 2025. "Education researchers’ beliefs and barriers towards data sharing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 4061-4075, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02188-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02188-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-025-02188-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-025-02188-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02188-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.