Author
Abstract
Healthcare professionals, the primary warriors, are emotionally exhausted because of the global health crisis; thus, understanding burnout and job satisfaction is imperative. Though the research topic is crucial and ample in empirical studies, it lacks a comprehensive literature review or bibliometric analysis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors that contribute to burnout and job satisfaction among healthcare workers. A bibliometric analysis was adopted to evaluate global trends by narrowing job burnout and job satisfaction research on the healthcare sector. Out of 1171 articles assessed, the analysis included 124 articles from the Scopus database, the largest research database covering a wide range of subjects compared to others. The nine-year period from 2015 to 2023 was selected to unbiasedly assess research trends both before and after the pandemic. The Bibliometrix package in R-Studio, along with other tools, was employed to perform the analysis and address the research questions. The results indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has heightened the need for mental health and burnout research among healthcare professionals, with a 28% increase. Research on occupational health, satisfaction, and patient safety before COVID-19 has shifted to workplace violence, stress, and resilience, with increased burnout and job satisfaction. The USA, China, the UK, Spain, and Italy are the leading countries with high research publications. Thus, understanding burnout and job satisfaction is crucial for managers and policymakers, as effective policies and support initiatives can boost satisfaction and reduce burnout.
Suggested Citation
S. Porkodi & Sonal Pundhir, 2025.
"Job satisfaction and burnout among healthcare employees: a bibliometric analysis before and after Covid-19 pandemic,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 4377-4408, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02187-7
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02187-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02187-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.