Author
Listed:
- Mehrbakhsh Nilashi
(UCSI University)
- Rabab Ali Abumalloh
(Qatar University)
- Masoumeh Zibarzani
(Alzahra University)
Abstract
Big social data analysis has played an important role in understanding learners’ preferences in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). This study investigates learners’ satisfaction with MOOCs using big social data analysis and a large-scale survey. The learners’ online reviews are analyzed using a hybrid method based on machine learning techniques and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. We adopted a text mining approach, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), which is widely used in topic modeling. We utilized a large dataset of 6004 online reviews obtained from the learners of Udemy’s online courses. The results from the analysis identified nine topics as aspects of the quality of online courses, namely Course Accessibility, Course Cost, Course Material Quality, Course Organization, Course Resource Availability, Course Usefulness, Instructor Explanation, Instructor Knowledge, and Practical Examples in the Course. The results of the analysis were used to construct a research model, which was evaluated using a large-scale survey (N = 464). The results of the PLS-SEM confirmed the significant impacts of the proposed research factors, except for course organization, on learners’ satisfaction. The results also revealed that the practical examples in the course moderate the relationships between course usefulness, instructor explanation, instructor knowledge, and learners’ satisfaction. The findings of this research contribute to both the theoretical and methodological aspects of discovering and analyzing the influential factors for learners' satisfaction with MOOCs, thereby offering valuable insights for enhancing the overall quality of education in digital learning environments.
Suggested Citation
Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Rabab Ali Abumalloh & Masoumeh Zibarzani, 2025.
"Big social data analysis for quality of MOOC courses: the moderating role of practical examples,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 4525-4557, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02170-2
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02170-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02170-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.