IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i5d10.1007_s11135-025-02168-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of the scale of quality perceived by electric power services offered by Brazilian companies

Author

Listed:
  • Anny Key Souza Mendonça

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina: Graduate Program in Production Engineering)

  • Jeovani Schmitt

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina: Graduate Program in Production Engineering)

  • Silvio Aparecido Silva

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina: Graduate Program in Production Engineering)

  • Gabriel Andrade Conradi Barni

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina: Graduate Program in Production Engineering)

  • Antonio Cezar Bornia

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina: Graduate Program in Production Engineering)

  • Dalton Francisco Andrade

    (Federal University of Santa Catarina: Graduate Program in Production Engineering)

Abstract

The global demand for electricity and the assessment of service quality provided by electricity utility companies requires robust methodological approaches to ensure accurate and reliable measurements. Traditional methods, such as Classical Test Theory (CTT), have been applied to the evaluation of latent traits, but they present limitations concerning reliability. Alternative methods derived from Psychometrics, such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and more recently, Item Response Theory (IRT), overcome these limitations. IRT offers advantages over CTT as it takes into account the difficulty and discrimination of each item, allowing for a more accurate estimation of the latent trait. In contrast, CTT uses only the total score, which can lead to inaccurate assessments. This paper applies Item Response Theory (IRT) to develop and validate a perceived quality of services scale. Using data from the Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire of the Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (ANEEL), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and IRT validated the scale’s unidimensional structure, demonstrating high reliability, as well as the difficulty and discrimination of the items. The results identified four levels of perceived quality, with most consumers classified as satisfied or very satisfied, although regional disparities were observed—satisfaction was highest in the South and lowest in the North. These findings reinforce the advantages of IRT in service quality assessment, enabling detailed response pattern modeling and the development of standardized, interpretable scales. The validated instrument provides regulators and utility companies with a valuable tool for monitoring service quality and optimizing policies to enhance consumer satisfaction. Future research may refine benchmarking methodologies for cross-market comparisons.

Suggested Citation

  • Anny Key Souza Mendonça & Jeovani Schmitt & Silvio Aparecido Silva & Gabriel Andrade Conradi Barni & Antonio Cezar Bornia & Dalton Francisco Andrade, 2025. "Construction of the scale of quality perceived by electric power services offered by Brazilian companies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 4283-4304, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02168-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02168-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-025-02168-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-025-02168-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02168-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.