Author
Abstract
This study employs the Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) model, thoroughly investigating the intricate linkage between urbanization, economic complexity, information and communication technology (ICT), and ecological footprint. It introduces trade openness and renewable energy as technology components, adding to the framework of the model. The study also tests the EKC hypothesis and the moderating impact of renewable energy sources on the relationship between economic complexity, ICT, and ecological footprint. The analysis is based on panel data from D-8 countries spanning 2003–2023. The analysis outcomes revealed that the N-shaped Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis, validated between ecological footprint and economic complexity, holds significant implications for policy decisions. They also indicate that urbanization escalates the ecological footprint, while ICT, renewable energy sources, and trade openness mitigate it, suggesting potential environmental sustainability strategies. Moreover, the findings indicate that urbanization, economic complexity, and the interplay of ICT and renewable energy sources can effectively reduce the ecological footprint, offering practical avenues for curbing environmental impact. The panel causality findings, which establish a bidirectional causality linkage between all explanatory variables and the ecological footprint, further underscore the importance of these factors in shaping environmental outcomes. Finally, within the context of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 7, 8, 11, 13, and 17, the links between urbanization, economic complexity, ICT, and the consumption of renewable energy resources are discussed, and policy recommendations are presented. Graphical Abstract
Suggested Citation
Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Tugba Nur & Emre E. Topaloglu, 2025.
"Examining the sustainable development process through the economic complexity, technology, urbanization, and renewable energy in D-8 countries,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 4461-4501, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02161-3
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02161-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02161-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.