Author
Listed:
- Song Jing
(Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
- Yunfei Shan
(Yunnan University)
- Shanlin Yang
(Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
- Xiting Zhou
(Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
- Miao Wang
(Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
- Zhengjie He
(Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
- Xiaolong Tao
(Yunnan University)
- Xia Guo
(Sichuan Vocational and Technical College of Communications)
- Daniel M. J. J. Stanley
(Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
- Leuta Philatelic Stanley
(Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
Abstract
In recent years in China, overseas returned PhDs are given preferential treatment compared to those at home, especially in the selection of outstanding personnel by certain universities and scientific research institutes. This paper focuses on investigating the influence of overseas doctoral learning experiences on the scientific research performance of the distinguished young scholars in China. Employing the White heteroscedasticity robust least squares method, negative binomial regression method, and Propensity Score Matching method, the study reveals a significant inhibitory effect of overseas doctoral learning experiences on the quantity of scientific research performance among distinguished youth fund winners. However, no significant impact is observed on the quality of their research. This research extends the understanding of the impact of universal doctoral education on scientific research performance within the most outstanding young scholars in China, and put forward the corresponding suggestions for the recruitment and the review of the Distinguished Young Scholars fund.
Suggested Citation
Song Jing & Yunfei Shan & Shanlin Yang & Xiting Zhou & Miao Wang & Zhengjie He & Xiaolong Tao & Xia Guo & Daniel M. J. J. Stanley & Leuta Philatelic Stanley, 2025.
"Who has higher scientific research productivity: PhDs from overseas or domestic?,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 3931-3958, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02153-3
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02153-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02153-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.