IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i4d10.1007_s11135-025-02131-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does accounting education shape the digitalization of the accounting profession? A cognitive mapping investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Karima Lajnef

    (ESCS, Sfax University)

Abstract

This study explores how accounting education influences students’ readiness for the digitalization of the accounting profession, with a particular focus on Tunisian accounting students. A qualitative approach is employed, utilizing cognitive mapping techniques with a sample of 74 students. Through cognitive mapping, key cognitive structures related to factors such as faculty expertise in digital accounting, resource availability, and continuous professional development initiatives are identified. Faculty expertise, in this context, refers to instructors’ proficiency with digital tools and their ability to incorporate these tools into their teaching. Resource availability pertains to the access students have to digital learning tools and development opportunities that enable engagement with modern accounting technologies. The findings indicate that faculty expertise and access to digital resources significantly contribute to students’ readiness for digital accounting tasks, fostering skills that go beyond traditional accounting practices. A practical recommendation is to implement targeted faculty development programs and increase funding for digital tools, ensuring alignment between accounting curricula and industry standards. This study underscores the importance of embedding digital literacy into accounting education, offering insights for educational institutions and policymakers on preparing students for the evolving technological demands of the accounting profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Karima Lajnef, 2025. "How does accounting education shape the digitalization of the accounting profession? A cognitive mapping investigation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 3441-3460, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02131-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02131-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-025-02131-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-025-02131-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khaldoon Al-Htaybat & Larissa von Alberti-Alhtaybat & Zaidoon Alhatabat, 2018. "Educating digital natives for the future: accounting educators’ evaluation of the accounting curriculum," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 333-357, July.
    2. Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Stefania Mierlita & Francesca Manes Rossi, 2024. "Exploring the uncharted territories: a structured literature review on cryptocurrency accounting and auditing," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 253-276, February.
    3. Erica Pimentel & Emilio Boulianne, 2020. "Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 325-361, December.
    4. Natalia Dashkevich & Steve Counsell & Giuseppe Destefanis, 2024. "Blockchain Financial Statements: Innovating Financial Reporting, Accounting, and Liquidity Management," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-36, July.
    5. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    6. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    7. repec:eme:par000:par-04-2021-0045 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Karima Lajnef & Siwar Ellouze & Ezzeddine Ben Mohamed, 2017. "How to explain accounting manipulations using the cognitive mapping technique? An evidence from Tunisia," American Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 31-50.
    9. Denise Jackson & Grant Michelson & Rahat Munir, 2022. "New technology and desired skills of early career accountants," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 548-568, February.
    10. Grosu, Veronica & Cosmulese, Cristina Gabriela & Socoliuc, Marian & Ciubotariu, Marius-Sorin & Mihaila, Svetlana, 2023. "Testing accountants' perceptions of the digitization of the profession and profiling the future professional," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    12. Hassan Damerji & Anwar Salimi, 2021. "Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 107-130, March.
    13. Dillard, Jesse & Roslender, Robin, 2011. "Taking pluralism seriously: Embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 135-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debora Bettiga & Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri, 2020. "Individuals’ adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 203-214, June.
    2. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2013. "Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, October.
    3. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    4. Joan Torrent-Sellens & Cristian Salazar-Concha & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Francesc Saigí-Rubió, 2021. "Using Digital Platforms to Promote Blood Donation: Motivational and Preliminary Evidence from Latin America and Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    6. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Scott, Stephanie & Hughes, Paul & Hodgkinson, Ian & Kraus, Sascha, 2019. "Technology adoption factors in the digitization of popular culture: Analyzing the online gambling market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Herman Fassou Haba & Omkar Dastane, 2018. "An Empirical Investigation on Taxi Hailing Mobile App Adoption: A Structural Equation Modelling," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 48-72, December.
    9. Sanjeev Verma, 2015. "Harnessing the Benefit of Social Networking Sites for Intentional Social Action: Determinants and Challenges," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 104-111, June.
    10. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    11. Muhammad Ali & Syed Ali Raza & Chin-Hong Puah & Mohd Zaini Abd Karim, 2017. "Islamic home financing in Pakistan: a SEM-based approach using modified TPB model," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1156-1177, November.
    12. Abou-Shouk, Mohamed A. & Lim, Wai Mun & Megicks, Phil, 2016. "Using competing models to evaluate the role of environmental pressures in ecommerce adoption by small and medium sized travel agents in a developing country," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 327-339.
    13. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    14. Al-Qeisi, Kholoud & Dennis, Charles & Alamanos, Eleftherios & Jayawardhena, Chanaka, 2014. "Website design quality and usage behavior: Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2282-2290.
    15. Chua Chang Jin & Lim Chee Seong & Aye Aye Khin, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Consumer Acceptance towards Fintech Products and Services in Malaysia," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 59-65, January.
    16. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2006_032 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    18. Gupta, Somya & Hassen, Majdi & Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Sahu, Ganesh P., 2024. "Cognitive, affective, and normative factors affecting digital insurance adoption among persons with disabilities: A two-stage SEM-ANN analysis," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Hongping Yuan & Yu Yang & Xiaolong Xue, 2019. "Promoting Owners’ BIM Adoption Behaviors to Achieve Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    20. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & Al-Nabhani, Khalid & Marriott, Hannah, 2020. "Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers' m-commerce mobile applications – An initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 139-157.
    21. Ivonne Angelica Castiblanco Jimenez & Laura Cristina Cepeda García & Maria Grazia Violante & Federica Marcolin & Enrico Vezzetti, 2020. "Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02131-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.