IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i3d10.1007_s11135-025-02084-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The M-PerFeCt questionnaire: assessing higher education students’ motivation in a peer feedback context

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka D. Pereira

    (University of Twente)

  • Maaike C. Heitink

    (University of Twente)

  • Kim Schildkamp

    (University of Twente)

  • Bernard P. Veldkamp

    (University of Twente)

Abstract

In higher education, teacher feedback has increasingly been replaced or complemented with peer feedback. But, when students lack motivation, they may not participate in the peer feedback activity adequately, and, thus, the activity may not have the desired effect. Motivation is a complex, difficult-to-measure concept, and existing questionnaires for assessing students’ motivation in the context of a peer feedback intervention in higher education have each considered only a few aspects of motivation to learn or motivation to participate in the peer feedback activity. However, a questionnaire that concurrently assesses (almost) all aspects of higher education students’ motivation in a peer feedback context is needed for researchers and practitioners to obtain a complete picture of students’ motivation, so they can determine whether and how this motivation needs to be improved. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the Motivation in a Peer Feedback Context (M-PerFeCt) questionnaire. Methodological pluralism was used to capture this complex concept while ensuring more rigorous scientific results, including eliciting a student and expert appraisal of the questionnaire and collecting responses to the questionnaire from higher education students in The Netherlands and performing exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Pre-activity and post-activity forms of the questionnaire were developed and validated. The final questionnaire comprised 66 items in 19 scales. The questionnaire provides insight into the underlying structure of students’ motivation in a peer feedback context. Additionally, it enables teachers and researchers to assess students’ motivation in a peer feedback context.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka D. Pereira & Maaike C. Heitink & Kim Schildkamp & Bernard P. Veldkamp, 2025. "The M-PerFeCt questionnaire: assessing higher education students’ motivation in a peer feedback context," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 2577-2621, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02084-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02084-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-025-02084-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-025-02084-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02084-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.