IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i2d10.1007_s11135-024-02031-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interviewing injured New Zealanders for paired longitudinal studies: a qualitative exploration of interviewers’ experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Brooke Craik

    (University of Otago)

  • Helen E. Owen

    (University of Otago)

  • Sarah Derrett

    (University of Otago)

  • Emma H. Wyeth

    (University of Otago)

Abstract

There is a growing body of literature outlining the influence of interviewers on the success of research studies, yet a paucity of research has focused on understanding the experiences of interviewers themselves. Considering this knowledge gap, this opportunistic qualitative study examined the experiences of interviewers conducting structured telephone follow-up interviews for the paired longitudinal cohort studies of injured New Zealanders, ‘The Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study 10 years on’ (POIS-10) and ‘POIS-10 Māori: Outcomes and experiences in the decade following injury’ (POIS-10 Māori). Based in Aotearoa me Te Waipounamu/New Zealand (NZ), this paper aimed to examine interviewers’ experiences of contacting participants after a 10 year interval, conducting long-term follow-up interviews, and interviewing during a global pandemic. Interviewers employed for POIS-10 and/or POIS-10 Māori were invited to take part in a group interview. With interviewers’ permission, interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. Nine interviewers participated in the study. Three key themes (with several related sub-themes) were identified: ‘reconnecting’, ‘sustaining balance’, and ‘the pandemic—the ordinary amongst the extraordinary’. This study provides useful insights about interviewers’ experiences of working on two paired national longitudinal studies engaging with participants who have had a long connection to the research projects. It is hoped that these findings, and the strategies that interviewers reported, may be useful to other researchers and interviewers undertaking longitudinal research.

Suggested Citation

  • Brooke Craik & Helen E. Owen & Sarah Derrett & Emma H. Wyeth, 2025. "Interviewing injured New Zealanders for paired longitudinal studies: a qualitative exploration of interviewers’ experiences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1621-1640, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-024-02031-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-02031-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-02031-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-02031-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen Bell & Eldin Fahmy & David Gordon, 2016. "Quantitative conversations: the importance of developing rapport in standardised interviewing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 193-212, January.
    2. Azadé Azad & Elisabet Sernbo & Veronica Svärd & Lisa Holmlund & Elisabeth Björk Brämberg, 2021. "Conducting In-Depth Interviews via Mobile Phone with Persons with Common Mental Disorders and Multimorbidity: The Challenges and Advantages as Experienced by Participants and Researchers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Kate Henley Averett, 2021. "A feminist public sociology of the pandemic: Interviewing about a crisis, during a crisis," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S2), pages 321-329, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merijn Eikelenboom & Melany Horsfall & Stasja Draisma & Jan H Smit, 2023. "Investigating people’s lifetime history of suicide attempts: a roadmap for studying interviewer-related error," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3183-3197, August.
    2. Braden Leap & Kimberly Kelly & Marybeth C. Stalp, 2022. "Choreographing social reproduction: Making personal protective equipment and gender during a neoliberal pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 758-777, May.
    3. Andrew Taeho Kim & Matt Erickson & Yurong Zhang & ChangHwan Kim, 2022. "Who is the “She” in the Pandemic “She-Cession”? Variation in COVID-19 Labor Market Outcomes by Gender and Family Status," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 1325-1358, June.
    4. Rosalind Edwards & Ann Phoenix & David Gordon & Karen Bell & Heather Elliott & Eldin Fahmy, 2017. "How paradata can illuminate technical, social and professional role changes between the Poverty in the UK (1967/1968) and Poverty and Social Exclusion in the UK (2012) surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2457-2473, November.
    5. Chinaza Uleanya & Ke Yu, 2023. "Data Collection in Times of Pandemic: A Self-Study and Revisit of Research Practices During a Crisis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    6. Mary Kung’u & Rhoda Kabuti & Hellen Babu & on behalf of The Maisha Fiti Study Champions & Chrispo Nyamweya & Monica Okumu & Anne Mahero & Zaina Jama & Polly Ngurukiri & Emily Nyariki & Mamtuti Panneh , 2023. "Conducting Violence and Mental Health Research with Female Sex Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ethical Considerations, Challenges, and Lessons Learned from the Maisha Fiti Study in Nairobi, Keny," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-12, May.
    7. Melany Horsfall & Merijn Eikelenboom & Stasja Draisma & Johannes H. Smit, 2021. "The Effect of Rapport on Data Quality in Face-to-Face Interviews: Beneficial or Detrimental?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-10, October.
    8. Yu Yao & Huiya Xu & Ha-Young Song, 2025. "Exploring the Key Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction in China’s Sustainable Second-Hand Clothing Market: A Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-33, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-024-02031-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.