IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v57y2023i1d10.1007_s11135-022-01346-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On distinguishing food insecurity levels with the Latin American and Caribbean Food Security Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Curtis Huffman

    (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM))

  • Héctor Nájera

    (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM))

Abstract

The Latin American and Caribbean Food Security Scale (ELCSA) is widely used in the region to classify population groups with presumably distinctive levels (mild, moderate or severe) of food (in)security. This paper puts under scrutiny the validity and utility of the resulting population groups using data from the Mexican National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure 2018. The analyses use scalogram analysis, Item Response Theory and Latent Class Analysis to look at the properties of the groups derived from the ELCSA. The paper shows that ELCSA’s capacity to actually distinguish between four levels of food insecurity is rather weak. The analyses suggest the ELCSA reliably captures severe food insecurity scores but not milder forms of food deprivation. A key objective of the ELCSA is to identify different ranges/groups of food insecurity, and the main implication of our findings is that it is time for a thorough makeover of the scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Curtis Huffman & Héctor Nájera, 2023. "On distinguishing food insecurity levels with the Latin American and Caribbean Food Security Scale," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 77-96, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01346-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01346-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-022-01346-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-022-01346-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01346-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.