IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v81y2016i1d10.1007_s11336-015-9494-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Erratum to: On the Link between Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Knowledge Space Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen Heller

    (University of Tübingen)

  • Luca Stefanutti

    (University of Padova)

  • Pasquale Anselmi

    (University of Padova)

  • Egidio Robusto

    (University of Padova)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Heller & Luca Stefanutti & Pasquale Anselmi & Egidio Robusto, 2016. "Erratum to: On the Link between Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Knowledge Space Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 250-251, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:81:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11336-015-9494-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9494-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-015-9494-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-015-9494-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Stefanutti & Debora Chiusole & Pasquale Anselmi & Andrea Spoto, 2020. "Extending the Basic Local Independence Model to Polytomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 684-715, September.
    2. Pasquale Anselmi & Egidio Robusto & Luca Stefanutti & Debora Chiusole, 2016. "An Upgrading Procedure for Adaptive Assessment of Knowledge," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(2), pages 461-482, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:81:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11336-015-9494-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.