IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v80y2015i1p196-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comment on the Asymptotics of a Distribution-Free Goodness of Fit Test Statistic

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Browne
  • Alexander Shapiro

Abstract

In a recent article Jennrich and Satorra (Psychometrika 78: 545–552, 2013 ) showed that a proof by Browne (British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37: 62–83, 1984 ) of the asymptotic distribution of a goodness of fit test statistic is incomplete because it fails to prove that the orthogonal component function employed is continuous. Jennrich and Satorra (Psychometrika 78: 545–552, 2013 ) showed how Browne’s proof can be completed satisfactorily but this required the development of an extensive and mathematically sophisticated framework for continuous orthogonal component functions. This short note provides a simple proof of the asymptotic distribution of Browne’s (British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37: 62–83, 1984 ) test statistic by using an equivalent form of the statistic that does not involve orthogonal component functions and consequently avoids all complicating issues associated with them. Copyright The Psychometric Society 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Browne & Alexander Shapiro, 2015. "Comment on the Asymptotics of a Distribution-Free Goodness of Fit Test Statistic," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 196-199, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:80:y:2015:i:1:p:196-199
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9383-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11336-013-9383-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-013-9383-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Jennrich & Albert Satorra, 2013. "Erratum to: Continuous orthogonal complement functions and distribution-free goodness of fit tests in moment structure analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 553-553, July.
    2. Robert Jennrich & Albert Satorra, 2013. "Continuous Orthogonal Complement Functions and Distribution-Free Goodness of Fit Tests in Moment Structure Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 545-552, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lifang Deng & Ke-Hai Yuan, 2016. "Comparing Latent Means Without Mean Structure Models: A Projection-Based Approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 802-829, September.
    2. So Yeon Chun & Michael W. Browne & Alexander Shapiro, 2018. "Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 48-66, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albert Satorra & Heinz Neudecker, 2015. "A Theorem on the Rank of a Product of Matrices with Illustration of Its Use in Goodness of Fit Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 938-948, December.
    2. Robert Jennrich & Albert Satorra, 2016. "The Infinitesimal Jackknife and Moment Structure Analysis Using Higher Order Moments," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 90-101, March.
    3. Lifang Deng & Ke-Hai Yuan, 2016. "Comparing Latent Means Without Mean Structure Models: A Projection-Based Approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 802-829, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:80:y:2015:i:1:p:196-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.