Author
Listed:
- Rod S. Taylor
(University of Glasgow)
- Kaylie Metcalfe
(Mtech Access Limited)
- Antoine Cremer
(Saint André Hospital)
- Sofie Brouwers
(Vrije Universiteit Brussels)
- Joost Daemen
(Erasmus University Medical Center)
- Sam Carter
(ReCor Medical)
- Kieran Murphy
(ReCor Medical)
- Marie-Claude Morice
(European Center for Cardiovascular Research (CERC))
- Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
(Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, URCEco, AP-HP, Hôpital de l’Hôtel Dieu, Paris, Santé Publique Hôpital Henri Mondor)
- Linh Ngo
(European Center for Cardiovascular Research (CERC))
- Michel Azizi
(Université Paris Cité; NSERM, CIC1418
AP-HP, Hypertension Department & DMU CARTE, Hôpital Européen)
- Ajay J. Kirtane
(Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital)
Abstract
Background Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) with the Paradise System has emerged as an adjunctive treatment option for the management of uncontrolled resistant hypertension (rHTN). This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of uRDN for rHTN across three European countries—Belgium, France and the Netherlands. Methods On the basis of a previously developed state-transition Markov model, we projected costs, life years (LYs) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) with the addition of uRDN to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone over patient lifetime. Analyses were based on the RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial, which demonstrated a mean reduction in office systolic blood pressure from a baseline of 8.5 mmHg at 2 months post-uRDN among patients with rHTN. Mortality and costs data were separately sourced and applied for each country independently. Country-specific discount rates were applied to both cost and outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty surrounding the model inputs and sensitivity of the model results to changes in parameter inputs. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results The base-case analyses of the models for all three countries show uRDN plus SoC results in improvement in both LYs and QALYs per patient and higher costs compared with SoC alone. The mean ICERs for each country model fall well below the respective country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTPs)—Belgium: WTP €40,000 and ICER €4426/QALY gained; France: WTP €50,000 and ICER €6261/QALY gained; and the Netherlands: WTP €20,000 and ICER €1654/QALY gained. Results were robust across scenarios and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions The addition of endovascular uRDN offers clinicians and payers a cost-effective adjunctive treatment approach alongside hypertensive medication for the management of rHTN in the healthcare systems of Belgium, France and the Netherlands.
Suggested Citation
Rod S. Taylor & Kaylie Metcalfe & Antoine Cremer & Sofie Brouwers & Joost Daemen & Sam Carter & Kieran Murphy & Marie-Claude Morice & Isabelle Durand-Zaleski & Linh Ngo & Michel Azizi & Ajay J. Kirtan, 2025.
"Cost-Effectiveness of Ultrasound Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension in Belgium, France and The Netherlands,"
PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 585-595, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:9:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-025-00574-2
DOI: 10.1007/s41669-025-00574-2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:9:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-025-00574-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.