IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v9y2025i4d10.1007_s41669-025-00569-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness of Using Conditional Economic Incentives to Improve Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Male Sex Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Chivardi

    (University of York)

  • Alejandro Zamudio-Sosa

    (National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM))

  • Marta Wilson-Barthes

    (Brown University School of Public Health)

  • Fernando Alarid-Escudero

    (Stanford University School of Medicine)

  • Monica Gandhi

    (University of California San Francisco)

  • Kenneth H. Mayer

    (Fenway Health, and Harvard University)

  • Don Operario

    (Emory University)

  • Omar Galárraga

    (Brown University School of Public Health)

Abstract

Introduction Conditional economic incentives can improve medication-taking behaviors among populations at risk of contracting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, there are no data on the cost-effectiveness of incentive programs for improving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence among male sex workers (MSWs) who have one of the highest HIV acquisition rates. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of incentive programs to improve adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among male sex workers Methods We conducted an economic evaluation of the PrEP Seguro randomized pilot trial in Mexico (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03674983). Among n = 110 MSWs, those randomized to the intervention received tiered incentives based on PrEP drug levels in scalp hair measured at three clinic visits over 6 months. The intervention led to a 28.7% increase in scalp hair PrEP concentration, consistent with increased adherence (p = 0.05). Here we use a micro-costing approach from the health system perspective to calculate costs. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated from the number of HIV infections averted through sufficient PrEP adherence (tenofovir concentration > 0.011 ng/mg corresponding to greater than or equal to three weekly doses). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) estimated the cost/QALY gained owing to the intervention. Results The mean cost per patient was US $165.53 and $179.55 among standard care and incentive patients, respectively. Over 6 months of follow-up, 62% of standard care patients and 78% of incentive recipients were PrEP adherent. After the program, the lifetime average QALYs gained per infection avoided were 9.17 (minimum, maximum: 7.5, 10.8) and 9.84 (minimum, maximum: 8.05, 11.6) among standard care and incentive patients, respectively. The 6-month ICER was US $20.92/QALY gained by the intervention, which was highly cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of US $8655 (Mexico’s 2020 per capita gross domestic product (GDP)). Discussion Using behavioral economics approaches for enhancing adherence to HIV prevention may offer health and fiscal benefits through reduced HIV incidence. Fully powered implementation trials can determine future cost-effectiveness of scaling up incentives for PrEP adherence among high-risk populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Chivardi & Alejandro Zamudio-Sosa & Marta Wilson-Barthes & Fernando Alarid-Escudero & Monica Gandhi & Kenneth H. Mayer & Don Operario & Omar Galárraga, 2025. "Cost-Effectiveness of Using Conditional Economic Incentives to Improve Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Male Sex Workers," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 649-659, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:9:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-025-00569-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-025-00569-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-025-00569-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-025-00569-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:9:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-025-00569-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.