IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v8y2024i1d10.1007_s41669-023-00452-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences for Living Arrangements in Dementia: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Speckemeier

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Carina Abels

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Klemens Höfer

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Anja Niemann

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Jürgen Wasem

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Anke Walendzik

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Silke Neusser

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

Abstract

Background Dementia affects about 55 million people worldwide. Demographic change and shifting lifestyles challenge the organization of dementia care. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit preferences for living arrangements in dementia in urban and rural regions of Germany. Methods Preliminary work included review of previous literature and focus groups. The DCE consists of seven attributes (group size, staff qualifications, organization of care, activities offered, support of religious practice, access to garden, consideration of food preferences) with three levels each. Individuals from the general population between the ages of 50 and 65 years were identified through population registration offices in three rural municipalities and one urban area, and 4390 individuals were approached via postal survey. A hierarchical Bayesian mixed logit model was estimated and interactions with sociodemographic characteristics were investigated. Results A total of 428 and 412 questionnaires were returned by rural and urban respondents, respectively. Access to a garden was perceived as the most important attribute (average importance 36.0% in the rural sample and 33.4% in the urban sample), followed by consideration of food preferences (15.8%, 17.8%), staff qualification (14.6%, 15.3%), care organization (11.4%, 12.3%), group size (12.2%, 11.1%), and range of activities (8.0%, 10.1%). The attribute relating to religious practice was given the least importance (2.1%, 0%). Preferences vary according to gender, age, religious beliefs, experience as an informal caregiver, and migrant background. Conclusion Heterogeneous preferences for living arrangements for people with dementia were identified. The expansion of concepts with access to natural environments for persons with dementia might be a viable option for the formal care market in Germany. Further research is needed to meet the challenges of setting up and designing innovative living arrangements for people with dementia. Preferences vary by gender, age, religious beliefs, experience as an informal caregiver, and migrant background.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Speckemeier & Carina Abels & Klemens Höfer & Anja Niemann & Jürgen Wasem & Anke Walendzik & Silke Neusser, 2024. "Preferences for Living Arrangements in Dementia: A Discrete Choice Experiment," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 65-78, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00452-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00452-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00452-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-023-00452-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00452-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.