IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v7y2023i5d10.1007_s41669-023-00419-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT–Fatigue) in Patients with Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

Author

Listed:
  • Edward V. Loftus

    (Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science)

  • Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan

    (Massachusetts General Hospital)

  • Wan-Ju Lee

    (AbbVie Inc)

  • Yuri Sanchez Gonzalez

    (AbbVie Inc)

  • Kristina A Fitzgerald

    (AbbVie Inc)

  • Kori Wallace

    (AbbVie Inc)

  • Wen Zhou

    (AbbVie Inc)

  • Leighann Litcher-Kelly

    (Adelphi Values)

  • Sarah B. Ollis

    (Adelphi Values)

  • Sylvia Su

    (Adelphi Values)

  • Silvio Danese

    (Humanitas University)

Abstract

Background Patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) frequently experience fatigue, although it is often overlooked in medical research and practice. Aims To explore patients’ experience of fatigue and evaluate content validity, psychometric properties, and score interpretability of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT–Fatigue) in patients with CD or UC. Methods Concept elicitation and cognitive interviews were conducted with participants aged ≥ 15 years with moderately-to-severely active CD (N = 30) or UC (N = 33). To evaluate psychometric properties (reliability and construct validity) and interpretation of FACIT–Fatigue scores, data from two clinical trials were analyzed [ADVANCE (CD): N = 850; U-ACHIEVE (UC): 248]. Meaningful within-person change was estimated using anchor-based methods. Results Almost all interview participants reported experiencing fatigue. Over 30 unique fatigue-related impacts were reported per condition. The FACIT–Fatigue was interpretable for most patients. FACIT–Fatigue items had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.86–0.88 for CD and 0.94–0.96 for UC); the total score displayed acceptable test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.60 for CD and > 0.90 for UC). FACIT–Fatigue scores had acceptable convergent validity with similar measures. A 7–10 point improvement for CD and 4–9 point improvement for UC on the FACIT–Fatigue total score may represent meaningful improvements. Conclusions These results highlight the importance of fatigue among adolescents and adults with CD or UC and provide evidence that the FACIT–Fatigue is content valid and produces reliable, valid, and interpretable scores in these populations. Care should be taken if using the questionnaire with adolescents who may be less familiar with the word “fatigue.” Clinical trial registration numbers NCT03105128 (date of registration: 4 April 2017) and NCT02819635 (date of registration: 28 June 2016).

Suggested Citation

  • Edward V. Loftus & Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan & Wan-Ju Lee & Yuri Sanchez Gonzalez & Kristina A Fitzgerald & Kori Wallace & Wen Zhou & Leighann Litcher-Kelly & Sarah B. Ollis & Sylvia Su & Silvio Danes, 2023. "Content Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT–Fatigue) in Patients with Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 7(5), pages 823-840, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00419-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00419-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00419-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-023-00419-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00419-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.