IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v7y2023i3d10.1007_s41669-023-00392-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elicitation of Health State Utilities Associated with Progression from Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Unresponsive Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)

Author

Listed:
  • Owen Alan Edwards Cooper

    (Evidera by PPD)

  • Ola Ghatnekar

    (Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S)

  • Natalia Piglowska

    (Evidera by PPD)

  • Charlie A. Smith

    (Evidera by PPD)

  • Paul Swinburn

    (Evidera by PPD)

  • James W. F. Catto

    (University of Sheffield)

  • Günter Niegisch

    (Heinrich Heine University)

  • Jørn Skibsted Jakobsen

    (Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S)

Abstract

Objectives The treatments for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) vary between bladder preserving intravesical approaches and radical cystectomy. The impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life may vary widely. The purpose of this study was to elicit the general public’s perspective on quality of life, measured as utility scores associated with treatment for Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive NMIBC and disease progression, for supporting economic evaluation of newly developed treatments for NMIBC. Materials and Methods Part I involved the development and testing of health states describing NMIBC, which was informed by a rapid review, expert input and a patient advisor. Part II involved elicitation of societal utility values for the different health states. Time trade-off (TTO) interviews were conducted with members of the UK general public. Five health states described different NMIBC scenarios including disease recurrence and progression. Participants ranked each health state, followed by the TTO valuation exercise. Descriptors included NMIBC symptom severity, impact and treatment characteristics. Results In total, 202 members of the general public participated. The mean age was 46 (standard deviation [SD] 14.6) years. Sample mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) and index scores were 83.2 (12.3) and 0.89 (0.18), respectively. Mean utilities were 0.781 for No High-Grade Recurrence, 0.586 for High-Grade Recurrence, 0.572 for > 1-Year Post-cystectomy and 0.283 for metastatic disease. The First Year Post-cystectomy path health state had a mean utility of 0.288. Pairwise comparisons found statistically significant differences between utilities (p 1-Year Post-cystectomy (p = 0.524). There were significant differences in utility scores by age and employment status. Conclusion This study provides utility scores for health states describing living with NMIBC, which is associated with a significant health-related quality-of-life burden. These values address an existing gap in available data and have the potential to be used in models evaluating the cost-effectiveness of both current and newly developed treatments for bladder cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Owen Alan Edwards Cooper & Ola Ghatnekar & Natalia Piglowska & Charlie A. Smith & Paul Swinburn & James W. F. Catto & Günter Niegisch & Jørn Skibsted Jakobsen, 2023. "Elicitation of Health State Utilities Associated with Progression from Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Unresponsive Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 469-477, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00392-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00392-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00392-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-023-00392-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:7:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00392-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.