IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v6y2022i4d10.1007_s41669-022-00340-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Longitudinal Psychometric Analysis of the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire (HCMSQ) Using Outcomes from the Phase III EXPLORER-HCM Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Reaney

    (IQVIA)

  • Prithvi Addepalli

    (IQVIA)

  • Veleka Allen

    (IQVIA)

  • John A. Spertus

    (Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City)

  • Chantal Dolan

    (CMD Consulting)

  • Amy J. Sehnert

    (MyoKardia, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Jennifer T. Fine

    (MyoKardia, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb)

Abstract

Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) symptoms include shortness of breath (SOB), fatigue, chest pain, palpitations, dizziness, and fainting. The HCM Symptom Questionnaire (HCMSQ), the only patient-reported outcome instrument designed to specifically measure HCM symptoms, yields four domain scores (SOB, tiredness, cardiovascular symptoms, syncope) and a total score. We evaluated the longitudinal psychometric properties of the HCMSQ using baseline to week 30 data from the phase III EXPLORER-HCM trial (NCT03470545). Methods Test–retest reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation of patients with stable Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) responses. Sensitivity to change was assessed via Spearman correlations with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23) and the EuroQoL visual analogue scale (EQ VAS), and via one-way ANOVA comparing change groups defined on clinical (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class, left ventricular outflow tract [LVOT] gradient, peak oxygen consumption [pVO2]) and patient-reported (PGIS, PGIC) variables. Meaningful change thresholds were established via PGIC/PGIS. Results All HCMSQ scores showed strong evidence of test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.70). Sensitivity to change was demonstrated with mostly strong/moderate correlations with KCCQ-23 and EQ VAS, and significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in PGIS, PGIC, pVO2, and NYHA (except tiredness domain) change categories, but not LVOT gradient. Clinically meaningful score reductions were ≥1 point for tiredness and cardiovascular symptoms domains, ≥ 2.5 points for SOB domain, and ≥2 points for total score. Conclusions Results suggest that HCMSQ is fit for purpose in capturing HCM symptoms and may provide evidence of treatment benefit from the patients’ perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Reaney & Prithvi Addepalli & Veleka Allen & John A. Spertus & Chantal Dolan & Amy J. Sehnert & Jennifer T. Fine, 2022. "Longitudinal Psychometric Analysis of the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire (HCMSQ) Using Outcomes from the Phase III EXPLORER-HCM Trial," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 575-586, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:6:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-022-00340-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-022-00340-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-022-00340-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-022-00340-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:6:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-022-00340-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.