IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v6y2022i4d10.1007_s41669-022-00332-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Analysis of Adjuvant Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Treatment Versus No Whole-Brain Radiotherapy After Stereotactic Radiosurgery and/or Surgery Among Adults with One to Three Melanoma Brain Metastases: Results from a Randomized Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Anh Dam Tran

    (UNSW
    The University of Sydney)

  • Angela M. Hong

    (The University of Sydney
    The University of Sydney)

  • Mai T. H. Nguyen

    (The University of Sydney)

  • Gerald Fogarty

    (St Vincent’s Clinic)

  • Victoria Steel

    (Monash University)

  • Elizabeth Paton

    (Monash University)

  • Rachael L. Morton

    (The University of Sydney
    The University of Sydney)

Abstract

Purpose We aimed to compare Australian health system costs at 12 months for adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) treatment after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and/or surgery versus observation among adults with one to three melanoma brain metastases. We hypothesized that treatment with adjuvant WBRT and subsequent healthcare would be more expensive than SRS/surgery alone. Methods The analysis was conducted alongside a multicentre, randomized phase III trial. A bespoke cost questionnaire was used to measure healthcare use, including hospitalizations, specialist and primary care visits, imaging, and medicines over 12 months. Mean per-patient costs were calculated based on the quantity of resources used and unit costs, reported in Australian dollars ($AU), year 2018 values. Skewness of cost data was determined using normality tests and censor-adjusted costs reported using the Kaplan–Meier sample average method. The analysis of difference in mean costs at each 2-month time point and at 12 months was performed and checked using Kruskal–Wallis, generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log link, modified Park test, ordinary least squares, and non-parametric bootstrapping. Results In total, 89 patients with similar characteristics at baseline were included in the cost analysis (n = 43 WBRT; n = 46 observation). Hospitalization cost was the main cost, ranging from 63 to 89% of total healthcare costs. The unadjusted 12-monthly cost for WBRT was $AU71,138 ± standard deviation 41,475 and for observation $AU69,848 ± 33,233; p = 0.7426. The censor-adjusted 12-monthly cost for WBRT was $AU90,277 ± 36,274 and $AU82,080 ± 34,411 for observation. There was no significant difference in 2-monthly costs between groups (p > 0.30 for all models). Conclusions Most costs were related to inpatient hospitalizations associated with disease recurrence. Adding WBRT after local SRS/surgery for patients with one to three melanoma brain metastases did not significantly increase health system costs during the first 12 months. Trial Registration ACTRN12607000512426, prospectively registered 14 September 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Anh Dam Tran & Angela M. Hong & Mai T. H. Nguyen & Gerald Fogarty & Victoria Steel & Elizabeth Paton & Rachael L. Morton, 2022. "Cost Analysis of Adjuvant Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Treatment Versus No Whole-Brain Radiotherapy After Stereotactic Radiosurgery and/or Surgery Among Adults with One to Three Melanoma Brain Metastases:," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 587-594, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:6:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-022-00332-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-022-00332-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-022-00332-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-022-00332-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anh Dam Tran & Gerald Fogarty & Anna K. Nowak & Vakaramoko Diaby & Angela Hong & Caroline Watts & Rachael L. Morton, 2020. "Cost-Effectiveness of Subsequent Whole-Brain Radiotherapy or Hippocampal-Avoidant Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Surgery Alone for Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastases," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 679-687, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:6:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-022-00332-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.