IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v5y2021i1d10.1007_s41669-020-00214-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in Malaysia: A Longitudinal Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anees ur Rehman

    (University Sains Malaysia
    Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan)

  • Mohamed Azmi Ahmad Hassali

    (University Sains Malaysia)

  • Sohail Ayaz Muhammad

    (University Sains Malaysia)

  • Sadia Shakeel

    (University Sains Malaysia)

  • Ong Siew Chin

    (University Sains Malaysia)

  • Irfhan Ali Bin Hyder Ali

    (Ministry of Health Malaysia)

  • Jaya Muneswarao

    (University Sains Malaysia)

  • Rabia Hussain

    (University Sains Malaysia)

Abstract

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires long-term pharmacological and non-pharmacological management that encompasses continuous economic burden on patients and society, and also results in productivity losses due to compromised quality of life. Among working-age patients, COPD is the 11th leading cause of work productivity loss. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the economic burden of COPD in Malaysia, including direct costs for the management of COPD and indirect costs due to productivity losses for COPD patients. Methodology Overall, 150 patients with an established diagnosis of COPD were followed-up for a period of 1 year from August 2018 to August 2019. An activity-based costing, ‘bottom-up’ approach was used to calculate direct costs, while indirect costs of patients were assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Results The mean annual per-patient direct cost for the management of COPD was calculated as US$506.92. The mean annual costs per patient in the management phase, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions were reported as US$395.65, US$86.4, and US$297.79, respectively; 31.66% of COPD patients visited the emergency department and 42.47% of COPD patients were admitted to the hospital due to exacerbation. The annual mean indirect cost per patient was calculated as US$1699.76. Productivity losses at the workplace were reported as 31.87% and activity limitations were reported as 17.42%. Conclusion Drugs and consumables costs were the main cost-driving factors in the management of COPD. The higher ratio of indirect cost to direct medical costs shows that therapeutic interventions aimed to prevent work productivity losses may reduce the economic burden of COPD.

Suggested Citation

  • Anees ur Rehman & Mohamed Azmi Ahmad Hassali & Sohail Ayaz Muhammad & Sadia Shakeel & Ong Siew Chin & Irfhan Ali Bin Hyder Ali & Jaya Muneswarao & Rabia Hussain, 2021. "Economic Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in Malaysia: A Longitudinal Study," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 35-44, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:5:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s41669-020-00214-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-020-00214-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-020-00214-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-020-00214-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Journal round-up: PharmacoEconomics – Open 5(1)
      by Rita Faria in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2021-04-29 06:00:05

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:5:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s41669-020-00214-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.