IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v4y2020i4d10.1007_s41669-020-00208-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Budget Impact of Introducing Tildrakizumab to a United States Health Plan for Managing Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Carrico

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Yang Zhao

    (Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.)

  • Xiaoying Jia

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Thor-Henrik Brodtkorb

    (RTI Health Solutions)

  • Alan Mendelsohn

    (Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.)

  • Simon Lowry

    (Roivant Sciences Ltd)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the budget impact of introducing tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from a US health plan perspective. Methods A budget impact model estimated costs before and after the adoption of tildrakizumab to a hypothetical US health plan with 1 million covered lives over 5 years. Additionally, the model included adalimumab, brodalumab, etanercept, guselkumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, and apremilast; biosimilars were not included. Model input data were obtained from the published literature, clinical trials, and prescription data. Market uptake for tildrakizumab was assumed as 1% annually over 5 years. Patients initiating or switching treatments required induction dosing; all others treated required maintenance dosing. The model compared the total annual costs for tildrakizumab versus treatment without tildrakizumab to calculate budget impact in 2018 US dollars. Scenarios exploring alternative assumptions for adverse events and market uptake rates were assessed, and a one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted. Results Within a health plan of 1 million members with an estimated 1048 patients receiving biologics or apremilast for psoriasis, the total annual health plan cost after introducing tildrakizumab decreased by $5585, $137,025, $205,538, $274,051, and $342,563 in years 1–5, respectively, resulting in a cumulative reduction of $964,763 over 5 years. The impact on total cost was largely due to drug acquisition costs. The incremental per member per month (PMPM) cost reductions were negligible in year 1, $0.01 in year 2, $0.02 in years 3–4, and $0.03 in year 5. Scenario and sensitivity analyses confirmed the model robustness. Conclusions The introduction of tildrakizumab with a 1% annual uptake over 5 years has the potential to reduce the cost of treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis for a US health plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Carrico & Yang Zhao & Xiaoying Jia & Thor-Henrik Brodtkorb & Alan Mendelsohn & Simon Lowry, 2020. "The Budget Impact of Introducing Tildrakizumab to a United States Health Plan for Managing Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 669-677, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:4:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-020-00208-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-020-00208-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-020-00208-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-020-00208-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 21st December 2020
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2020-12-21 12:00:05

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:4:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-020-00208-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.