IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v4y2020i2d10.1007_s41669-019-00177-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Technology Assessment of Drugs in Ireland: An Analysis of Timelines

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Connolly

    (St James’s University Teaching Hospital)

  • Helen O’Donnell

    (St James’s University Teaching Hospital
    St James’s Hospital)

  • Felicity Lamrock

    (St James’s University Teaching Hospital
    St James’s Hospital)

  • Lesley Tilson

    (St James’s University Teaching Hospital
    St James’s Hospital)

  • Michael Barry

    (St James’s University Teaching Hospital
    St James’s Hospital)

Abstract

Background The National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics (NCPE) is commissioned by the Corporate Pharmaceutical Unit of the Health Service Executive (HSE-CPU) to assess the evidence for the comparative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of drugs for use by patients in Ireland. All new drugs are required to undergo rapid review (RR) appraisal by the NCPE. Following this, high-cost drugs or those predicted to have a significant budget impact then undergo a full health technology assessment (HTA) appraisal by the NCPE. Objective The objective of this paper was to quantify each stage of the timeline from marketing authorisation (MA) to completion of HTA appraisal and explore the association between submission features and the time to appraise RRs and HTAs. Methods All RRs and HTAs submitted to the NCPE (2015–2017 inclusive) were included in the dataset. Several dates and features of each submission were also listed for the purpose of analysis. Results A total of 158 RR and 49 HTA appraisals were completed by the NCPE between 2015 and 2017. The median time from MA to submission of RR was 59 days; the median time to appraise RR was 31.5 days. Only 49% of RRs appraised (2015–2017 inclusive) were recommended for HTA. The median time from RR decision to submission of HTA was 115 days, and the median time taken by the NCPE to appraise an HTA was 131 days. Conclusion This paper identifies which stages of the process make a substantial contribution to the HTA timeline. Time to submission of RR varied widely between submissions, with only a few companies choosing to submit prior to an MA being granted. The average RR appraisal time was in line with the 4-week timeframe set out in a 2016 agreement. The time to appraise an HTA was longer than the 90-day timeframe.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Connolly & Helen O’Donnell & Felicity Lamrock & Lesley Tilson & Michael Barry, 2020. "Health Technology Assessment of Drugs in Ireland: An Analysis of Timelines," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 287-296, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:4:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s41669-019-00177-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-00177-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-019-00177-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-019-00177-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 1st June 2020
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2020-06-01 11:00:00

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:4:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s41669-019-00177-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.