IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v3y2019i3d10.1007_s41669-019-0116-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimated Versus Observed Expenditure Associated with Medicines Recommended by the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart Keeping

    (All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre, University Hospital Llandough)

  • Paul N. Deslandes

    (All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre, University Hospital Llandough)

  • Kathryn E. Haines

    (All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre, University Hospital Llandough)

  • Philip A. Routledge

    (All Wales Therapeutics and Toxicology Centre, University Hospital Llandough)

Abstract

Objectives The All Wales Medicines Strategy Group (AWMSG) appraises the clinical and cost effectiveness of new medicines being considered for National Health Service (NHS) prescribing in Wales (UK). The aim of this study was to compare the estimated expenditure on selected medicines submitted by pharmaceutical companies for appraisal with the observed expenditure on these medicines following recommendation. Methods Medicines appraised and recommended for use in NHS Wales by AWMSG between May 2005 and December 2013 were identified for inclusion in the study. Estimates of expenditure were obtained from company submissions to AWMSG. Primary and secondary care dispensing databases were used to obtain observed expenditure. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to compare the observed and estimated expenditure in each of the 3 years after introduction of the medicine. Results Forty-nine medicines appraised and recommended by AWMSG during the period of interest were included in the study. Median estimated and observed expenditure in each of the 3 years post-recommendation were as follows: year 1 £86,400 and £47,300; year 2 £175,500 and £73,200; year 3 £212,100 and £78,900 (p = 0.03, p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). The expenditure on 42 of the 49 medicines (82%) was overestimated in at least one of the 3 years post-introduction, with 32 (65%) overestimated in all 3 years. Conclusion In their applications for health technology appraisal, pharmaceutical companies tended to overestimate the expenditure of the majority of medicines recommended by AWMSG. These findings have implications for the assessment of predicted expenditure as part of the process of medicines appraisal in Wales.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart Keeping & Paul N. Deslandes & Kathryn E. Haines & Philip A. Routledge, 2019. "Estimated Versus Observed Expenditure Associated with Medicines Recommended by the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 343-350, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:3:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-019-0116-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0116-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-019-0116-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-019-0116-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joost W. Geenen & Svetlana V. Belitser & Rick A. Vreman & Martijn Bloois & Olaf H. Klungel & Cornelis Boersma & Anke M. Hövels, 2020. "A novel method for predicting the budget impact of innovative medicines: validation study for oncolytics," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(6), pages 845-853, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:3:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-019-0116-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.