Author
Abstract
Background Pneumococcal disease can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL) of children. Health utilities are used to measure the disease burden and calculate quality-adjusted life year (QALY) estimates. These estimates provide critical inputs in economic evaluations of pneumococcal vaccines in children. Objectives This study aimed to synthesize utility values used in cost-utility analyses (CUAs) of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines and to summarize published utility studies on pneumococcal disease and post-meningitis sequelae (PMS) in children on a global scale. Methods Two targeted literature reviews were conducted to identify CUAs of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines and original studies on health utilities of pneumococcal disease and PMS. Both literature reviews identified relevant studies using published reviews, supplemented by de novo searches conducted in MEDLINE in June 2024 to cover periods not included in those reviews. References from published literature reviews on QoL of pneumococcal disease and CUAs were screened to identify additional original utility studies. Health utility values applied in the CUAs were summarized and the source studies for these utilities were reviewed. For original utility studies, methods and utility estimates were summarized for each condition. Results The study identified 45 CUAs of pediatric pneumococcal vaccines in North America and Europe published from 2004 to 2024, and 21 original utility studies on pneumococcal disease or PMS in children published globally from 1994 to 2017. QALY decrement was the most common utility input in CUAs. Most CUAs referenced an earlier CUA for utility inputs, which were often sourced from one or two original utility studies for each health state. Most source studies were published more than two decades ago; some common source studies were conducted in adults. Utility estimates from original studies showed considerable variability, with ranges of −0.330 to 0.6882 for meningitis, −0.331 to 0.93 for non-meningitis invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), −0.054 to 0.71 for inpatient pneumonia, 0.412–0.82 for outpatient pneumonia, 0.389–0.97 for acute otitis media (AOM)/simple AOM, 0.434–0.540 for recurrent AOM, −0.33 to 0.89 for neurological deficits, and 0.217–0.97 for hearing loss. Variability in methods, including in the surveyed population, utility elicitation method, and use of different country-specific preference weights, substantially impacted utility values. Overall, the methods were not suitable for temporary health states. Additionally, many studies used instruments that have not been validated in children. Conclusions Original utility studies demonstrated that pneumococcal disease and PMS are associated with impaired QoL in children; however, there was considerable variability in utility estimates across studies, reflecting the inherent methodological challenges in estimating utilities for acute diseases in children. Most CUAs referenced previous CUAs for health utility values, which were sourced from a limited number of outdated original utility studies. Contemporary data and methods adapted for acute diseases in children are needed for future studies. Given the significance of health utilities in the economic valuations of new pneumococcal vaccines, utility values should be carefully selected in CUAs, considering alternative sources and assumptions.
Suggested Citation
Min Huang & Jipan Xie & Hela Romdhani & Yan Song & Sun Lee & Daisy Liu & Elamin Elbasha & Salini Mohanty & Donna Rowen & Matthew S. Kelly, 2025.
"Global Assessment of Health Utilities Associated with Pneumococcal Disease in Children—Targeted Literature Reviews,"
PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 43(9), pages 1001-1045, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01504-0
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-025-01504-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01504-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.