IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v43y2025i5d10.1007_s40273-025-01469-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nirsevimab for Preventing Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Lower Respiratory Tract Disease in Dutch Infants: An Analysis Including All-Infant Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Zeevat

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
    Health-Ecore)

  • Simon Pol

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
    Health-Ecore)

  • Alexia Kieffer

    (Sanofi)

  • Maarten J. Postma

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
    University of Groningen
    Health-Ecore)

  • Cornelis Boersma

    (University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
    Open University
    Health-Ecore)

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of nirsevimab, a recently authorized monoclonal antibody (mAb) for the prevention of lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), in comparison with the standard practice involving palivizumab for high-risk infants during their first RSV season in the Netherlands. Methods A static cost-effectiveness model was populated for the Netherlands to evaluate different immunization strategies for nirsevimab over a single RSV season from a societal perspective. The model considered the most recently published RSV incidence data (average incidence from 2006 to2018), costs (adjusted to the 2023 price year), and associated health effects. Extensive scenario analyses were conducted to explore various strategies, and sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the model’s robustness. Results In the base-case scenario, all-infant protection—a strategy of in-season with catch-up immunization for all infants—nirsevimab has the potential to prevent numerous RSV-related cases, including 2333 hospitalizations and 150 intensive-care admissions, in the overall population compared with the standard of care. Nirsevimab appears to be cost effective under this strategy with an economically justifiable acquisition price for nirsevimab of €220 at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Sensitivity analyses indicate a 52% probability that nirsevimab is cost effective at this threshold. Comparison of different vaccination strategies revealed that the all-infant protection approach was the one that prevented the higher number of cases. Conclusions This study indicates that universal infant immunization with nirsevimab has the potential to be cost effective and significantly reduces the burden of RSV among Dutch infants. These findings underscore the importance of implementing effective protective measures against RSV-LRTD, reducing the pressure on the healthcare system during the RSV season.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Zeevat & Simon Pol & Alexia Kieffer & Maarten J. Postma & Cornelis Boersma, 2025. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nirsevimab for Preventing Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Lower Respiratory Tract Disease in Dutch Infants: An Analysis Including All-Infant Protection," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 569-582, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01469-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-025-01469-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-025-01469-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-025-01469-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01469-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.