IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v43y2025i12d10.1007_s40273-025-01528-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI) Versus Colistin + Meropenem (COL + MER) for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL)-Producing Enterobacterales in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Falcone

    (University of Pisa)

  • Xiyu Bao

    (Source Health Economics)

  • Fionn Woodcock

    (Source Health Economics)

  • Roberto Di Virgilio

    (Pfizer Italy)

  • Maria Alejandra Vidal Pereira

    (Pfizer Italy)

  • Michal Kantecki

    (Pfizer International Operations)

  • Maria Gheorghe

    (Pfizer Inc.)

Abstract

Background and Objective Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a novel combination antibiotic approved in Europe for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia; complicated urinary tract infection, including pyelonephritis and for infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms with limited treatment options. This analysis assessed the cost effectiveness of ATM-AVI ± metronidazole versus colistin + meropenem (COL + MER) for the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, including infections with suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from the public payer perspective in Italy using phase III trial data. Methods The cost-effectiveness analysis adopted a decision tree model to simulate the clinical pathway of complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, followed by a Markov model to capture lifetime health outcomes on cured patients, with costs valued in 2024 Euros and discounted at 3%. The model captures the impact of resistant pathogens and side effects (i.e. nephrotoxicity). Model uncertainty was assessed using a probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis. Results The ATM-AVI treatment sequence (ATM-AVI ± metronidazole followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure) had improved clinical outcomes and higher cure rates, shorter hospital stays and higher quality-adjusted life-year gains compared with the COL + MER sequence (COL + MER followed by cefiderocol after treatment failure). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in the ATM-AVI sequence was dominant for complicated intra-abdominal infection and was €1552 per quality-adjusted life-year for hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 in Italy. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that ATM-AVI is expected to be a cost-effective use of Italian healthcare resources for treating suspected metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, including complicated intra-abdominal infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Falcone & Xiyu Bao & Fionn Woodcock & Roberto Di Virgilio & Maria Alejandra Vidal Pereira & Michal Kantecki & Maria Gheorghe, 2025. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI) Versus Colistin + Meropenem (COL + MER) for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase (MBL)-Producing Enterobacterales in I," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 43(12), pages 1479-1494, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01528-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-025-01528-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-025-01528-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-025-01528-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01528-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.