Author
Listed:
- Nanati Legese Alemu
(Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University)
- Neha Das
(Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University)
- Jennifer J. Watts
(Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University)
- Suzanne Robinson
(Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University)
- Gang Chen
(University of Melbourne)
- Lan Gao
(Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University)
Abstract
Background and Objective Informal caregivers play a critical role in supporting individuals with musculoskeletal conditions. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the psychological and economic burdens associated with caregiving for musculoskeletal conditions. Methods We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, EconLIT, and APA PsycINFO for studies published between 2000 and April 2025. Studies were eligible if they examined the psychological and economic burden of informal caregiving for adults with musculoskeletal conditions. Screening and data extraction were conducted using EndNote 21 and Covidence. Risk of bias was assessed using the CASP checklist for psychological burden studies and the EVERS criteria for economic burden studies. Data were synthesized narratively. An exploratory meta-analysis of informal care hours was conducted using a subset of studies with sufficient statistical data. Results A total of 41 studies were included, with 24 reporting psychological burdens, 16 economic burdens, and one for both. Caregiving burden included emotional, social, financial, and time-related impacts, impacting the caregivers’ quality of life. Higher anxiety and depression were correlated with a greater caregiver burden. Informal care costs varied by musculoskeletal condition type, location, severity, intensity, and valuation method. Reported informal care hours showed substantial variation across studies. The overall risk of bias across included studies was low. Conclusions This systematic review highlights the considerable psychological, economic, and time-related burdens faced by informal caregivers of individuals with musculoskeletal conditions. Caregivers face high stress, physical strain, and opportunity costs. The lack of standardized assessments hinders accurate burden quantification, economic evaluation, and policy responses. Future efforts should focus on adopting consistent measurement instruments and valuation methods, alongside implementing structured policies, financial support, and psychological interventions to better support the caregivers.
Suggested Citation
Nanati Legese Alemu & Neha Das & Jennifer J. Watts & Suzanne Robinson & Gang Chen & Lan Gao, 2025.
"The Burden of Informal Caregiving for Adults with Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review,"
PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 43(10), pages 1179-1204, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01523-x
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-025-01523-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01523-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.