Author
Listed:
- Teebah Abu-Zahra
(Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht University)
- Sabine E. Grimm
(Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht University)
- Mirre Scholte
(Radboud UMC)
- Manuela Joore
(Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht University)
Abstract
Background Developing health economic decision-analytic models requires making modelling choices to simplify reality while addressing the decision context. Finding the right balance between a decision-analytic model’s simplicity and its adequacy is important but can be challenging. Objective We aimed to develop a tool that supports the systematic reporting and justification of modelling choices in a decision-analytic model, ensuring it is adequate and only as complex as necessary for addressing the decision context. Methods We identified decision-analytic model features from the key literature and our expertise. For each feature, we defined both simple and complex modelling choices that could be selected, and the consequences of simplifying a feature contrary to requirements of the decision context. Next, we designed the tool and assessed its clarity and completeness through interviews and expert workshops. To ensure consistency of use, we developed a glossary sheet and applied the tool in an illustrative case: a decision-analytic model on a repurposed drug for treatment-resistant hypertension. Results We conducted five interviews and two workshops with 18 decision-analytic model experts. The developed SMART (Systematic Model adequacy Assessment and Reporting Tool) consists of a framework of 28 model features, allowing users to select modelling choices per feature, then assessing the consequences of their choices for validity and transparency. SMART also includes a glossary sheet. The treatment resistant hypertension case example is provided separately. Conclusions SMART supports decision-analytic model development and assessment, by promoting clear reporting and justification of modelling choices, and highlighting their consequences for model validity and transparency. Thoughtful and well-justified modelling choices can help optimise the use of resources and time for model development, while ensuring the model is adequate to support decision making.
Suggested Citation
Teebah Abu-Zahra & Sabine E. Grimm & Mirre Scholte & Manuela Joore, 2025.
"Can We Make Health Economic Decision Models as Simple as Possible, But Not Simpler? Introducing SMART tool,"
PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 43(10), pages 1235-1250, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01515-x
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-025-01515-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s40273-025-01515-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.