IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v41y2023i8d10.1007_s40273-023-01271-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Van Remoortel

    (Belgian Red Cross
    Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven)

  • Hans Scheers

    (Belgian Red Cross
    Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven)

  • Bert Avau

    (Belgian Red Cross)

  • Jørgen Georgsen

    (Odense University Hospital)

  • Susan Nahirniak

    (University of Alberta
    Transfusion and Transplantation Medicine, Alberta Precision Laboratories)

  • Nadine Shehata

    (University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital)

  • Simon J. Stanworth

    (NHS Blood and Transplant
    University of Oxford, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
    Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Emmy De Buck

    (Belgian Red Cross
    Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven)

  • Veerle Compernolle

    (Belgian Red Cross
    Ghent University)

  • Philippe Vandekerckhove

    (Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven
    Belgian Red Cross
    Stellenbosch University)

Abstract

Objectives Thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics are a potential alternative to platelet transfusion to minimize blood loss in patients with thrombocytopenia. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics, compared with not using TPO mimetics, in adult patients with thrombocytopenia. Methods Eight databases and registries were searched for full economic evaluations (EEs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were synthesized as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY) or as cost per health outcome (e.g. bleeding event avoided). Included studies were critically appraised using the Philips reporting checklist. Results Eighteen evaluations from nine different countries were included, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics compared with no TPO, watch-and-rescue therapy, the standard of care, rituximab, splenectomy or platelet transfusion. ICERs varied from a dominant strategy (i.e. cost-saving and more effective), to an incremental cost per QALY/health outcome of EUR 25,000–50,000, EUR 75,000–750,000 and EUR > 1 million, to a dominated strategy (cost-increasing and less effective). Few evaluations (n = 2, 10%) addressed the four principal types of uncertainty (methodological, structural, heterogeneity and parameter). Parameter uncertainty was most frequently reported (80%), followed by heterogeneity (45%), structural uncertainty (43%) and methodological uncertainty (28%). Conclusions Cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics in adult patients with thrombocytopenia ranged from a dominant strategy to a significant incremental cost per QALY/health outcome or a strategy that is clinically inferior and has increased costs. Future validation and tackling the uncertainty of these models with country-specific cost data and up-to-date efficacy and safety data are needed to increase the generalizability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Van Remoortel & Hans Scheers & Bert Avau & Jørgen Georgsen & Susan Nahirniak & Nadine Shehata & Simon J. Stanworth & Emmy De Buck & Veerle Compernolle & Philippe Vandekerckhove, 2023. "Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(8), pages 869-911, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01271-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01271-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.