IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v41y2023i12d10.1007_s40273-023-01298-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De Novo Cost-Effectiveness Model Framework for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis—Modeling Approach and Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Gal

    (Evidera)

  • Gyorgyi Feldmajer

    (Evidera)

  • Margarida Augusto

    (Novo Nordisk A/S)

  • Ray Gani

    (Evidera)

  • Emma Hook

    (Delta Hat)

  • Ash Bullement

    (Delta Hat)

  • Zoe Philips

    (Delta Hat)

  • Inger Smith

    (White Box Health Economics Ltd)

Abstract

Background Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic liver disease associated with hepatic morbidity and mortality and extra-hepatic comorbidities. Published NASH cost-effectiveness models (CEMs) are heterogeneous and consistently omit comorbid conditions that frequently co-exist alongside NASH. We aimed to develop a de novo CEM framework that incorporates extra-hepatic disease states and outcomes alongside hepatic components to enable future estimation of the cost-effectiveness of NASH interventions. Methods Patient-level simulation and cohort-level Markov models were implemented in the same framework. Model inputs included fibrosis progression; late-stage liver disease outcomes; comorbidity outcomes for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity; mortality; health-related quality of life; and direct medical costs. The prototype analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of obeticholic acid versus standard of care from a US payer perspective over a lifetime horizon with costs and effects discounted at 3% per annum. However, the CEM was designed for easy adaptation to other countries, time horizons, and other considerations. Efficacy and adverse event parameters were obtained from the 18-month interim analysis of the REGENERATE trial. Outputs include total and incremental costs, total life years, and quality-adjusted life years. Results In this model, total costs, total life years, and quality-adjusted life years were all higher with obeticholic acid compared with standard of care. Cross-validation of this model with the 2016 and 2020 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review models revealed marked differences, mainly driven by mortality inputs, transition probability estimates, and incorporation of the effect of treatment and comorbidities. Conclusion This is the first CEM in NASH to incorporate the clinical consequences of several comorbidities. The flexible yet standardized framework permits estimation of the cost-effectiveness of NASH interventions in a variety of settings. The model currently includes several assumptions and will be further developed as more relevant data become available.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Gal & Gyorgyi Feldmajer & Margarida Augusto & Ray Gani & Emma Hook & Ash Bullement & Zoe Philips & Inger Smith, 2023. "De Novo Cost-Effectiveness Model Framework for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis—Modeling Approach and Validation," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(12), pages 1629-1639, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01298-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01298-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-023-01298-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-023-01298-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:12:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01298-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.