IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v41y2023i11d10.1007_s40273-023-01299-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaccinating the German Population Aged 60 Years and Over with a Quadrivalent High-Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard-Dose Vaccines: A Transmission and Budget Impact Model

Author

Listed:
  • Kathrin Pahmeier

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Christian Speckemeier

    (Essener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH)

  • Silke Neusser

    (Essener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH)

  • Jürgen Wasem

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Janine Biermann-Stallwitz

    (Essener Forschungsinstitut für Medizinmanagement (EsFoMed) GmbH)

Abstract

Background and Objective In Germany, influenza vaccination is mainly advised for persons aged 60 years and over and individuals with health risks. Since 2021, an inactivated, quadrivalent high-dose influenza vaccine (IIV4-HD) has been recommended for persons aged 60 years and over. The aim of this study was to calculate the impact of vaccinating the German population aged 60 years and over with IIV4-HD compared to standard-dose influenza vaccines (IIV4-SD) with regard to health outcomes and costs. Methods An age-stratified deterministic compartment model was built to simulate the course of influenza infection for the German population in the season 2019/20. Probabilities for health outcomes and cost data were searched from the literature and were used to compare the influenza-related health and economic effects for different scenarios. Perspectives were those of the statutory health insurance and the society. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results From the statutory health insurance perspective, vaccinating the German population aged 60 years and over with IIV4-HD would have prevented 277,026 infections (− 1.1%) with an increase of overall direct costs of €224 million (+ 40.1%) compared with IIV4-SD. A separate analysis showed that increased vaccination of 75% (World Health Organization recommendation for older age groups) in persons aged 60 years and over using IIV4-SD only would prevent 1,289,648 infections (− 5.1%) and would save costs from a statutory health insurance perspective of €103 million (− 13.2%) compared with IIV4-HD at actual vaccination rates. Conclusions The modeling approach offers important insights into the epidemiological and budgetary impact of different vaccination scenarios. Achieving a higher vaccination coverage with IIV4-SD in persons aged 60 years and over would result in lower costs and fewer influenza infections compared with the scenario with IIV4-HD and actual vaccination rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathrin Pahmeier & Christian Speckemeier & Silke Neusser & Jürgen Wasem & Janine Biermann-Stallwitz, 2023. "Vaccinating the German Population Aged 60 Years and Over with a Quadrivalent High-Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard-Dose Vaccines: A Transmission and Budget Impact Model," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(11), pages 1539-1550, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01299-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01299-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-023-01299-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-023-01299-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01299-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.