IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v41y2023i11d10.1007_s40273-023-01291-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of txSim: A Model of Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Preston Ngo

    (The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW)

  • Deme Karikios

    (Nepean Hospital
    University of Sydney)

  • David Goldsbury

    (The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW)

  • Stephen Wade

    (The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW)

  • Zarnie Lwin

    (Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital
    University of Queensland
    The Prince Charles Hospital)

  • Brett G. M. Hughes

    (Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital
    University of Queensland
    The Prince Charles Hospital)

  • Kwun M. Fong

    (The Prince Charles Hospital
    The University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre)

  • Karen Canfell

    (The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW)

  • Marianne Weber

    (The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW)

Abstract

Background and Objective Since 2016, new therapies have transformed the standard of care for lung cancer, creating a need for up-to-date evidence for health economic modelling. We developed a discrete event simulation of advanced lung cancer treatment to provide estimates of survival outcomes and healthcare costs in the Australian setting that can be updated as new therapies are introduced. Methods Treatment for advanced lung cancer was modelled under a clinician-specified treatment algorithm for Australia in 2022. Prevalence of lung cancer subpopulations was extracted from cBioPortal and the Sax Institute’s 45 and Up Study, a large prospective cohort linked to cancer registrations. All costs were from the health system perspective for the year 2020. Pharmaceutical and molecular diagnostic costs were obtained from public reimbursement fees, while other healthcare costs were obtained from health system costs in the 45 and Up Study. Treatment efficacy was obtained from clinical trials and observational study data. Costs and survival were modelled over a 10-year horizon. Uncertainty intervals were generated with probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Overall survival predictions were validated against real-world studies. Results Under the 2022 treatment algorithm, estimated mean survival and costs for advanced lung cancer 10 years post-diagnosis were 16.4 months (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 14.7–18.1) and AU$116,069 (95% UI: $107,378–$124,933). Survival and costs were higher assuming optimal treatment utilisation rates (20.5 months, 95% UI: 19.1–22.5; $154,299, 95% UI: $146,499–$161,591). The model performed well in validation, with good agreement between predicted and observed survival in real-world studies. Conclusions Survival improvements for advanced lung cancer have been accompanied by growing treatment costs. The estimates reported here can be used for budget planning and economic evaluations of interventions across the spectrum of cancer control.

Suggested Citation

  • Preston Ngo & Deme Karikios & David Goldsbury & Stephen Wade & Zarnie Lwin & Brett G. M. Hughes & Kwun M. Fong & Karen Canfell & Marianne Weber, 2023. "Development and Validation of txSim: A Model of Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment in Australia," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(11), pages 1525-1537, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01291-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01291-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-023-01291-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-023-01291-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:41:y:2023:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-023-01291-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.