IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v39y2021i9d10.1007_s40273-021-01048-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Luca M. M. Janssen

    (Maastricht University)

  • Ruben M. W. A. Drost

    (Maastricht University)

  • Aggie T. G. Paulus

    (Maastricht University)

  • Kirsty Garfield

    (University of Bristol)

  • William Hollingworth

    (University of Bristol)

  • Sian Noble

    (University of Bristol)

  • Joanna C. Thorn

    (University of Bristol)

  • Irina Pokhilenko

    (Maastricht University)

  • Silvia M. A. A. Evers

    (Maastricht University
    Centre for Economic Evaluation and Machine Learning)

Abstract

Background While the methods for conducting health economics research in general are improving, current guidelines provide limited guidance regarding resource use measurement (RUM). Consequently, a variety of methods exists, yet there is no overview of aspects to consider when deciding on the most appropriate RUM methodology. Therefore, this study aims to (1) identify and categorize existing knowledge regarding aspects of RUM, and (2) develop a framework that provides a comprehensive overview of methodological aspects regarding RUM. Methods Relevant articles were identified by enrolling a search string in six databases and handsearching the DIRUM database. Included articles were descriptively reviewed and served as input for a comprehensive framework. Health economics experts were involved during the process to establish the framework’s face validity. Results Forty articles were included in the scoping review. The RUM framework consists of four methodological RUM domains: ‘Whom to measure’, addressing whom to ask and whom to measure; ‘How to measure’, addressing the different approaches of measurement; ‘How often to measure’, addressing recall period and measurement patterns; and ‘Additional considerations’, which covers additional aspects that are essential for further refining the methodologies for measurement. Evidence retrieved from the scoping review was categorized according to these domains. Conclusion This study clustered the aspects of RUM methodology in health economics into a comprehensive framework. The results may guide health economists in their decision making regarding the selection of appropriate RUM methods and developing instruments for RUM. Furthermore, policy makers may use these findings to review study results from an evidence-based perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca M. M. Janssen & Ruben M. W. A. Drost & Aggie T. G. Paulus & Kirsty Garfield & William Hollingworth & Sian Noble & Joanna C. Thorn & Irina Pokhilenko & Silvia M. A. A. Evers, 2021. "Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(9), pages 983-993, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01048-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susanne Mayer & Michael Berger & Alexander Konnopka & Valentin Brodszky & Silvia M. A. A. Evers & Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen & Mencia R. Guitérrez-Colosia & Luis Salvador-Carulla & A-La Park & William , 2022. "In Search for Comparability: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Costs for Health and Social Care Services in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:9:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01048-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.