IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v39y2021i3d10.1007_s40273-020-00967-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budget Impact of Oral Semaglutide Intensification versus Sitagliptin among US Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Uncontrolled with Metformin

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Wehler

    (IQVIA)

  • Dominik Lautsch

    (Merck & Co., Inc.)

  • Stacey Kowal

    (IQVIA)

  • Glenn Davies

    (Merck & Co., Inc.)

  • Andrew Briggs

    (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)

  • Qianyi Li

    (IQVIA)

  • Swapnil Rajpathak

    (Merck & Co., Inc.)

  • Adnan Alsumali

    (Merck & Co., Inc.)

Abstract

Background Oral semaglutide was approved in 2019 for blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and was the first oral glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA). T2DM is associated with substantial healthcare expenditures in the US, so the cost of a new intervention should be weighed against clinical benefits. Objective This study evaluated the budget impact of a treatment pathway with oral semaglutide 14 mg daily versus oral sitagliptin 100 mg daily among patients not achieving target glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level despite treatment with metformin. Methods This study used the validated IQVIA™ CORE Diabetes Model to simulate the treatment impact of oral semaglutide 14 mg and sitagliptin 100 mg over a 5-year time horizon from a US healthcare sector (payer) perspective. Trial data (PIONEER 3) informed cohort characteristics and treatment effects, and literature sources informed event costs. Population and market share data were from the literature and data on file. The analysis evaluated the estimated budget impact of oral semaglutide 14 mg use for patients currently using sitagliptin 100 mg considering both direct medical and treatment costs to understand the impact on total cost of care, given underlying treatment performance and impact on avoidable events. Results In a hypothetical plan of 1 million lives, an estimated 1993 patients were treated with sitagliptin 100 mg in the target population. Following these patients over 5 years, the incremental direct medical and treatment costs of a patient using oral semaglutide 14 mg versus sitagliptin 100 mg was $US16,562, a 70.7% increase (year 2019 values). A hypothetical payer would spend an additional $US3,300,143 (7.1%) over 5 years for every 10% of market share that oral semaglutide 14 mg takes away from sitagliptin 100 mg. Univariate and scenario analyses with alternate inputs and assumptions demonstrated consistent results. Conclusions Use of oral semaglutide 14 mg in patients currently receiving sitagliptin 100 mg substantially increases the budget impact for patients with T2DM whose blood glucose level is not controlled with metformin over a 5-year time horizon for US healthcare payers.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Wehler & Dominik Lautsch & Stacey Kowal & Glenn Davies & Andrew Briggs & Qianyi Li & Swapnil Rajpathak & Adnan Alsumali, 2021. "Budget Impact of Oral Semaglutide Intensification versus Sitagliptin among US Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Uncontrolled with Metformin," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 317-330, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00967-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00967-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-020-00967-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-020-00967-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason Yeaw & Shawn Halinan & Dionne Hines & Amy DeLozier & Magaly Perez & Mark Boye & Kristina Boye & Christopher Blanchette, 2014. "Direct Medical Costs for Complications Among Children and Adults with Diabetes in the US Commercial Payer Setting," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 219-230, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Journal round-up: PharmacoEconomics 39(3)
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2021-04-05 06:00:12

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paola Rucci & Vera Maria Avaldi & Claudio Travaglini & Cristina Ugolini & Elena Berti & Maria Luisa Moro & Maria Pia Fantini, 2020. "Medical Costs of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in a Single Payer System: A Classification and Regression Tree Analysis," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 181-190, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s40273-020-00967-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.