IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v37y2019i1d10.1007_s40273-018-0707-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Burden of Celiac Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth S. Mearns

    (ZS Associates)

  • Aliki Taylor

    (Takeda Development Centre Europe)

  • Talia Boulanger
  • Kelly J. Craig

    (Truven Health Analytics, An IBM Company)

  • Michele Gerber

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co)

  • Daniel A. Leffler

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co)

  • Jennifer Drahos

    (Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co)

  • David S. Sanders

    (Royal Hallamshire Hospital and University of Sheffield)

  • Benjamin Lebwohl

    (Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University Medical Center)

Abstract

Background The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) has rapidly increased over recent decades, but costs related to CD remain poorly quantified. Objective This systematic review assessed the economic burden of CD in North America and Europe. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify English-language literature from 2007 to 2018 that assessed costs, cost effectiveness, and health resource utilization for CD. Results Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 28 (57.1%) addressed costs of testing and diagnosis; 33 (67.3%) were from Europe. The cost per positive CD diagnosis of testing patients already undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy for other indications ranged from 1300 Canadian dollars ($Can) in Canada (2016 value) to €44,712 in the Netherlands (2013 value). Adding the CD test was cost effective when it combined diagnostic modalities (e.g., serology and biopsy). Direct annual excess costs to a US payer per diagnosed CD patient totaled $US6000 (2013 value) more than for a person without CD, chiefly due to outpatient care. Hospitalizations, emergency visits, and medication use were more common with CD. After initiating a gluten-free diet (GFD), patients visited primary care providers less often, used more medications, and missed fewer days from school and work. Conclusions Most of the few available economic studies of CD assess testing and diagnosis costs, especially in Europe. Methods of testing generally are considered cost effective when they combine diagnostic modalities in symptomatic patients. Most costs to a payer of managing CD derive from outpatient care. Following GFD initiation, patients lose fewer days from work and school than pretreatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth S. Mearns & Aliki Taylor & Talia Boulanger & Kelly J. Craig & Michele Gerber & Daniel A. Leffler & Jennifer Drahos & David S. Sanders & Benjamin Lebwohl, 2019. "Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Burden of Celiac Disease," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 45-61, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:37:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40273-018-0707-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0707-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-018-0707-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-018-0707-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:37:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40273-018-0707-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.