IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v36y2018i5d10.1007_s40273-018-0618-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Sara D’Angiolella

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Paolo Angelo Cortesi

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Alessandra Lafranconi

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Mariangela Micale

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Sveva Mangano

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Giancarlo Cesana

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani

    (University of Milan-Bicocca)

Abstract

Background Psoriatic arthritis is a long-term inflammatory arthropathy occurring in a subgroup of patients with psoriasis. In addition to irreversible bone erosions, joint destruction, and skin manifestations, psoriatic arthritis is associated with numerous comorbid conditions. Over the last 5 years, new treatments emerged; the analysis and comparisons of their additional costs and the added benefits have become increasingly important to optimize the limited resources available. Methods A systematic literature review covering PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed from May 2012 to October 2017 focusing on the most recent evidence of costs, benefits, and burden of psoriatic arthritis and its treatments. All economic evaluations assessing the burden of patients with psoriatic arthritis and written in English were eligible for inclusion. We also performed an assessment of the quality of the studies. Results Of the 1652 references found in the literature search, nine cost-effectiveness analyses and 12 cost-of-illness studies were included in the current review. Patients with psoriatic arthritis incur substantially higher direct and indirect costs, as compared with patients with psoriasis without arthritis or patients with other inflammatory diseases. The cost of treatment with biologic therapies is the major predictor of the total cost. However, individuals with psoriatic arthritis are also affected by substantial productivity losses and indirect costs. Biologic therapies are generally cost effective vs. conventional therapies (e.g., synthetic drugs) for treating psoriatic arthritis. Conclusions Psoriatic arthritis is associated with a significant economic burden and biologic therapies contribute significantly to these costs. Biologic therapies are more effective than disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the symptoms and signs of psoriatic arthritis and for improving quality of life and inhibiting structural radiological damage. Therefore, biologic therapies are cost effective compared with conventional therapies: the increased direct cost associated with biologic drugs is offset by the significant improvement in the efficacy of treatments and in patient management of psoriatic arthritis.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Sara D’Angiolella & Paolo Angelo Cortesi & Alessandra Lafranconi & Mariangela Micale & Sveva Mangano & Giancarlo Cesana & Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani, 2018. "Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Literature Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 567-589, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:36:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s40273-018-0618-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0618-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-018-0618-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-018-0618-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Angelo Cortesi & Carla Fornari & Paolo Gisondi & Florenzo Iannone & Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo & Elisabetta Aloisi & Martina Fiocchi & Daniela Ritrovato & Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani, 2023. "A Cross-Indication Budget Impact Model of Secukinumab for the Treatment of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis and Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in Italy," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 405-416, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:36:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s40273-018-0618-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.