IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v34y2016i11d10.1007_s40273-016-0419-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Apremilast for Treating Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Critique of the Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Eleftherios Sideris

    (University of York)

  • Mark Corbett

    (University of York)

  • Stephen Palmer

    (University of York)

  • Nerys Woolacott

    (University of York)

  • Laura Bojke

    (University of York)

Abstract

As part of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) single technology appraisal (STA) process, the manufacturer of apremilast was invited to submit evidence for its clinical and cost effectiveness for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for whom disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been inadequately effective, not tolerated or contraindicated. The Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and Centre for Health Economics at the University of York were commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). This paper provides a description of the ERG review of the company’s submission, the ERG report and submission and summarises the NICE Appraisal Committee’s subsequent guidance (December 2015). In the company’s initial submission, the base-case analysis resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £14,683 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for the sequence including apremilast (positioned before tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-α inhibitors) versus a comparator sequence without apremilast. However, the ERG considered that the base-case sequence proposed by the company represented a limited set of potentially relevant treatment sequences and positions for apremilast. The company’s base-case results were therefore not a sufficient basis to inform the most efficient use and position of apremilast. The exploratory ERG analyses indicated that apremilast is more effective (i.e. produces higher health gains) when positioned after TNF-α inhibitor therapies. Furthermore, assumptions made regarding a potential beneficial effect of apremilast on long-term Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) progression, which cannot be substantiated, have a very significant impact on results. The NICE Appraisal Committee (AC), when taking into account their preferred assumptions for HAQ progression for patients on treatment with apremilast, placebo response and monitoring costs for apremilast, concluded that the addition of apremilast resulted in cost savings but also a QALY loss. These cost savings were not high enough to compensate for the clinical effectiveness that would be lost. The AC thus decided that apremilast alone or in combination with DMARD therapy is not recommended for treating adults with active PsA that has not responded to prior DMARD therapy, or where such therapy is not tolerated.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleftherios Sideris & Mark Corbett & Stephen Palmer & Nerys Woolacott & Laura Bojke, 2016. "The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Apremilast for Treating Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Critique of the Evidence," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(11), pages 1101-1110, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:34:y:2016:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-016-0419-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0419-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-016-0419-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-016-0419-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huiqin Yang & Dawn Craig & David Epstein & Laura Bojke & Kate Light & Ian Bruce & Mark Sculpher & Nerys Woolacott, 2012. "Golimumab for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 257-270, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Kearns & Myfanwy Lloyd Jones & Matt Stevenson & Chris Littlewood, 2013. "Cabazitaxel for the Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 479-488, June.
    2. László Gulácsi & Fanni Rencz & Márta Péntek & Valentin Brodszky & Ruth Lopert & Noémi Hevér & Petra Baji, 2014. "Transferability of results of cost utility analyses for biologicals in inflammatory conditions for Central and Eastern European countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 27-34, May.
    3. Sophie Whyte & Abdullah Pandor & Matt Stevenson, 2012. "Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(12), pages 1119-1132, December.
    4. Nicholas Latimer & Christopher Carroll & Ruth Wong & Paul Tappenden & Michael Venning & Raashid Luqmani, 2014. "Rituximab in Combination with Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(12), pages 1171-1183, December.
    5. Jonathan Tosh & Rachel Archer & Sarah Davis & Matt Stevenson & John Stevens, 2013. "Golimumab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis After the Failure of Previous Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 653-661, August.
    6. Eldon Spackman & Stephen Rice & Gill Norman & Dong-Churl Suh & Alison Eastwood & Stephen Palmer, 2013. "Trastuzumab for the Treatment of HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 185-194, March.
    7. Lesley Uttley & Ben Kearns & Shijie Ren & Matt Stevenson, 2013. "Aripiprazole for the Treatment and Prevention of Acute Manic and Mixed Episodes in Bipolar I Disorder in Children and Adolescents: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(11), pages 981-990, November.
    8. Laura Bojke & Andrea Manca & Miqdad Asaria & Ronan Mahon & Shijie Ren & Stephen Palmer, 2017. "How to Appropriately Extrapolate Costs and Utilities in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(8), pages 767-776, August.
    9. Rita Faria & Eldon Spackman & Jane Burch & Belen Corbacho & Derick Todd & Chris Pepper & Nerys Woolacott & Stephen Palmer, 2013. "Dabigatran for the Prevention of Stroke and Systemic Embolism in Atrial Fibrillation: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 551-562, July.
    10. Mary Kilonzo & Jenni Hislop & Andrew Elders & Cynthia Fraser & Donald Bissett & Samuel McClinton & Graham Mowatt & Luke Vale, 2013. "Pazopanib for the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 15-24, January.
    11. Jane Burch & Susan Griffin & Claire McKenna & Simon Walker & James Paton & Kath Wright & Nerys Woolacott, 2012. "Omalizumab for the Treatment of Severe Persistent Allergic Asthma in Children Aged 6–11 Years," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(11), pages 991-1004, November.
    12. Afschin Gandjour & Dennis A. Ostwald, 2020. "Cost Effectiveness of Secukinumab Versus Other Biologics and Apremilast in the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis in Germany," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 109-125, February.
    13. E. Simpson & P. Fitzgerald & P. Evans & P. Tappenden & N. Kalita & J. Reckless & A. Bakhai, 2013. "Bivalirudin for the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 269-275, April.
    14. Karen Smith & Su Golder & Abeed Sarker & Yoon Loke & Karen O’Connor & Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez, 2018. "Methods to Compare Adverse Events in Twitter to FAERS, Drug Information Databases, and Systematic Reviews: Proof of Concept with Adalimumab," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 41(12), pages 1397-1410, December.
    15. Nigel Armstrong & Manuela Joore & Thea Asselt & Kate Misso & Nathan Manning & Florian Tomini & Jos Kleijnen & Rob Riemsma, 2013. "Golimumab for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 415-425, May.
    16. Janette Greenhalgh & Adrian Bagust & Angela Boland & Michaela Blundell & James Oyee & Sophie Beale & Yenal Dundar & Juliet Hockenhull & Chris Proudlove & Patrick Chu, 2013. "Rituximab for the First-Line Maintenance Treatment of Follicular Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 403-413, May.
    17. Sophie Whyte & Abdullah Pandor & Matt Stevenson, 2012. "Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(12), pages 1119-1132, December.
    18. Joanne O’Connor & Stephen Rice & Alison Smith & Mark Rodgers & Rocio Rodriguez Lopez & Dawn Craig & Nerys Woolacott, 2016. "The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: A Critique of the Evidence," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 337-348, April.
    19. Rachid Rafia & Emma Simpson & Matt Stevenson & Diana Papaioannou, 2013. "Trabectedin for the Treatment of Advanced Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 471-478, June.
    20. Bernd Schweikert & Chiara Malmberg & Örjan Åkerborg & Gayathri Kumar & Debby Nott & Sandeep Kiri & Christophe Sapin & Susanne Hartz, 2020. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sequential Biologic Therapy with Ixekizumab Versus Secukinumab in the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis with Concomitant Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis in the UK," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 635-648, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:34:y:2016:i:11:d:10.1007_s40273-016-0419-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.