IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v24y2006i1p35-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness of Rosiglitazone Oral Combination for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Arran Shearer
  • Adrian Bagust
  • Andreas Liebl
  • Oliver Schoeffski
  • Anita Goertz

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: To assess the cost-effectiveness of rosiglitazone in combination with other oral agents for the treatment of overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany. Methods: The Diabetes Decision Analysis of Cost — type 2 model was adapted for clinical practice and healthcare financing rules in Germany. The model was calibrated using Cost of Diabetes in Europe Type 2 study data and national statistics. The perspective is that of the sickness funds, and includes all hospital inpatient, ambulatory, rehabilitation, and diabetes therapy, other medications, and sickness leave. The model simulates lifetime treatment histories and associated health outcomes and costs for age and sex-matched cohorts of 1000 overweight and obese patients. The measures of effectiveness used in the analysis were life-years and quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). Results: The combination therapy of rosiglitazone with metformin or sulfonylurea produces better glycaemic control than conventional care of metformin with sulfonylurea and insulin in most patients, extends the viability of oral therapy before requiring insulin, and typically leads to lifetime cost increases across all treatment types. The improvements in glycaemic control lead to survival gains and reductions in morbidity, because of the reduced risk of developing or progressing to later stages of complications. Improvements in morbidity and mortality generate additional QALYs. Costs and health outcomes combine to yield favourable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, which fall below international ‘willingness-to-pay’ thresholds in the medium term. Conclusion: The model predicts that rosiglitazone in combination with other oral agents is a cost-effective intervention for the treatment of normal weight, overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes when compared with conventional care in Germany. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Arran Shearer & Adrian Bagust & Andreas Liebl & Oliver Schoeffski & Anita Goertz, 2006. "Cost-effectiveness of Rosiglitazone Oral Combination for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Germany," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 35-48, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:24:y:2006:i:1:p:35-48
    DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200624001-00004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/00019053-200624001-00004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/00019053-200624001-00004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Palmer & Craig Currie, 2006. "Modelling Lifetime Metabolic Progression and Cost Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 927-929, September.
    2. Arran Shearer & Adrian Bagust & F. Ampudia-Blasco & Belén Martínez-Lage Álvarez & Isabel Pérez Escolano & Gonzalo París, 2006. "Lifetime Health Consequences and Cost-effectiveness of Rosiglitazone in Combination with Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-59, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:24:y:2006:i:1:p:35-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.