IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v23y2005i10p1057-1072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eplerenone

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Croom
  • Greg Plosker

Abstract

Eplerenone (Inspra™) is a selective aldosterone blocker. When added to standard medical therapy, eplerenone significantly improved morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and clinical evidence of heart failure following acute myocardial infarction (MI), in a well designed, placebo-controlled trial known as EPHESUS (Eplerenone Post-acute myocardial infarction Heart failure Efficacy and SUrvival Study). Although eplerenone was generally well tolerated, it was associated with a higher incidence of hyperkalaemia than placebo. Cost-effectiveness analyses based on this trial have been performed in the US, The Netherlands, Germany, France and Spain. Direct medical costs were analysed based on prospectively collected resource-use data with local costs applied; modelling was conducted to calculate incremental costs per life-year or QALY gained, with survival curves assumed to remain parallel after treatment ended. Eplerenone was associated with a gain of 0.0304 life-years (≈11 days) compared with placebo during the study period. Based on these analyses, eplerenone was cost effective compared with placebo in patients with LV systolic dysfunction and heart failure after an MI when added to standard therapy for 16 months. The incremental cost per life-year gained for eplerenone versus placebo (for a range of three different life-expectancy projections) was $US10 402–21 876 in the US (year 2001 costs, except for eplerenone [2004]) [equivalent to €12 274–25 814; mid-2001 exchange rate], €5365–12 795 for The Netherlands (year 2003 costs), €6956–14 628 for Germany, €5432–11 423 for France and €8626–18 141 for Spain (year of costing not reported). The US, Dutch, French and Spanish analyses estimated that >90% of observations for incremental cost per life-year gained were below a threshold of $US50 000 or €50 000. Incremental costs per QALY gained for eplerenone versus placebo in the US, Dutch, French and Spanish analyses were $US15 330–32 405 (€18 089–38 238), €12 148, €8005–16 922 and €12 713–26 873, respectively. Clinical and pharmacoeconomic data comparing eplerenone with another active drug, such as spironolactone, in this patient population are not available. In conclusion, when added to standard therapy in patients with LV systolic dysfunction and heart failure after an acute MI, eplerenone was associated with significant reductions in mortality and morbidity compared with placebo. Despite some inherent limitations, available pharmacoeconomic data from Europe and the US indicate that eplerenone is a cost-effective treatment compared with placebo in terms of incremental cost per life-year gained in this patient population. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2005

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Croom & Greg Plosker, 2005. "Eplerenone," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 1057-1072, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:23:y:2005:i:10:p:1057-1072
    DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200523100-00008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/00019053-200523100-00008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/00019053-200523100-00008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:23:y:2005:i:10:p:1057-1072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.