IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v9y2016i5d10.1007_s40271-016-0166-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive Testing of an Electronic Version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised with Pediatric and Adolescent Sickle Cell Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Neehar Gupta

    (Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center)

  • April N. Naegeli

    (Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center)

  • Diane M. Turner-Bowker

    (ERT)

  • Emuella M. Flood

    (ICON plc, Clinical Outcomes Assessments)

  • Lori Ellen Heath

    (Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center)

  • Shelley M. Mays

    (Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center)

  • Carlton Dampier

    (Emory University School of Medicine, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta)

Abstract

Background Patient diaries and pain scales can capture the course and complications of pain managed at home in children. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is a validated scale showing reliability in children, but it has not been validated in children with sickle cell disease (SCD). Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate comprehension and usability of an electronic modified version of the FPS-R among pediatric patients with SCD. Methods This was a cross-sectional, qualitative study involving in-person interviews with children/adolescents from the USA and their parents/legal guardians. Interviews involved cognitive debriefing and usability testing of the FPS-R. Results In total, 22 children with SCD aged 4–17 years participated. Children aged 4–6 were generally unable to demonstrate clear understanding of the FPS-R and its response scale. Overall, children aged ≥7 years understood the instrument and could complete it on the electronic device, although children aged 7–8 often needed assistance from the parent. Children aged 9–17 years were able to read and complete the instrument independently. Most participants considered the electronic device easy to use. Conclusions The FPS-R was shown to be a comprehensible and usable pain measure for children aged 7–17 with SCD and to be beneficial for future clinical studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Neehar Gupta & April N. Naegeli & Diane M. Turner-Bowker & Emuella M. Flood & Lori Ellen Heath & Shelley M. Mays & Carlton Dampier, 2016. "Cognitive Testing of an Electronic Version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised with Pediatric and Adolescent Sickle Cell Patients," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 9(5), pages 433-443, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:9:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0166-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0166-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-016-0166-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-016-0166-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:9:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0166-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.