IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v9y2016i3d10.1007_s40271-015-0150-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Involvement in the Design of a Patient-Centered Clinical Trial to Promote Adherence to Supplemental Oxygen Therapy in COPD

Author

Listed:
  • Kristen E. Holm

    (National Jewish Health
    Colorado School of Public Health)

  • Richard Casaburi

    (Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center)

  • Scott Cerreta

    (COPD Foundation)

  • Hélène A. Gussin

    (University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System)

  • Julian Husbands

    (Apria Healthcare)

  • Janos Porszasz

    (Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center)

  • Valentin Prieto-Centurion

    (University of Illinois at Chicago)

  • Robert A. Sandhaus

    (National Jewish Health
    AlphaNet
    Alpha-1 Foundation)

  • Jamie L. Sullivan

    (COPD Foundation)

  • Linda J. Walsh

    (COPD Foundation)

  • Jerry A. Krishnan

    (University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System
    University of Illinois at Chicago)

Abstract

Background Patients are increasingly viewed as key stakeholders who can contribute in meaningful ways to clinical research and are emphasized in research funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). We are not aware of other peer-reviewed publications that report methods and outcomes of patient engagement to refine study design for a PCORI-sponsored clinical effectiveness trial. Objective The aim of this report was to describe the process and outcomes of involving patients in the design of a clinical trial to promote adherence to supplemental oxygen therapy among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods In-person focus groups and individual discussions via telephone and email were used to elicit feedback to refine the intervention and clarify outcomes of highest importance to patients. Results A total of 25 patients and five caregivers provided feedback. Their feedback has informed decisions regarding the length of intervention sessions (20 min and in some cases longer was acceptable), the importance of including caregivers, and discussion topics (e.g., social discomfort about using oxygen in public, identifying personally relevant reasons to use oxygen, pulmonary rehabilitation). Multiple outcomes were rated as highly important to patients (physical function, fatigue, sleep, anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities), and the outcome that was ranked as most important varied by individual. Therefore, multiple patient-reported outcomes will be used as endpoints for the clinical trial. Conclusions Patient involvement led to refinements of the intervention and clinical trial endpoints to better address the expressed needs and concerns of patients and caregivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristen E. Holm & Richard Casaburi & Scott Cerreta & Hélène A. Gussin & Julian Husbands & Janos Porszasz & Valentin Prieto-Centurion & Robert A. Sandhaus & Jamie L. Sullivan & Linda J. Walsh & Jerry A, 2016. "Patient Involvement in the Design of a Patient-Centered Clinical Trial to Promote Adherence to Supplemental Oxygen Therapy in COPD," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 9(3), pages 271-279, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:9:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-015-0150-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0150-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-015-0150-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-015-0150-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:9:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-015-0150-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.